MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2018327141 · doi:10.4043/15124-ms

Operation Overview of the 2002 Mallik Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program at the Mackenzie Delta in the Canadian Arctic

2003· article· en· W2018327141 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOffshore Technology Conference · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Établissements canadiensCanadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCoringPermafrostArcticPetroleum engineeringNile deltaPetroleumWirelineGeologyWell loggingFormation evaluationClathrate hydrateEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringOceanographyDrillingHydrateGeotechnical engineeringTelecommunications

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The first production test of methane hydrate layers was carried out at the Mackenzie Delta in the Canadian Arctic. Three wells, named JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 3L-38, 4L-38 and 5L-38, were drilled through hydrate layers at depths of approximately 900-1100m beneath 640m of permafrost on a line at 40m spacing. Coring, logging, various scientific experiments and production testing were performed over a 79- day period from December 2001 to March 2002. This research project was funded by participants from Japan, Canada, US, Germany and India. The Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) was the coordinator of the science program and Japan National Oil Corporation (JNOC) along with Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. (JAPEX) were the operators. JAPEX Canada Ltd., a subsidiary of JAPEX, acted as the legal operator in Canada and Canadian Petroleum Engineering Inc. (CPE) was retained to provide JAPEX with operational management for the remote arctic environment. The production testing was achieved using two testing methods. Six short duration depressurization tests were conducted using Schlumberger's Modular Dynamic Formation Tester (MDT). A longer duration, thermal stimulation test was carried out by circulating hot fluid past the hydrate layers. An extensive research program was conducted to monitor the formation response to the testing. Cross well tomography surveys were conducted from the observation wells before and during the testing. The post-test wireline log response was compared with pre-test log. The wellbore temperatures were monitored on all wells using fiber-optic cables. These data are valuable for improving the reservoir simulation models to assess gas hydrate production. A practical model is essential for a country such as Japan that has been seeking to economically develop deep water marine gas hydrates off its coast. This paper describes the field operation, explaining how all the programs were accomplished successfully in the limited operational period. The full research gas hydrate research program being conducted at the Mallik site is ongoing with a scheduled public release of the results expected on or before August 2004. Background Gas hydrate accumulations within deepwater marine sediments and below Arctic permafrost are being considered by a number of countries as a possible energy source for future. Japan, which has little conventional hydrocarbon reserves and surrounded by deepwater, has been seeking to develop the potential of gas hydrates in the last decade. In the past five years, JNOC has operated three field experiments in collaboration with JAPEX to assess commercial and scientific goals, under promotion of METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry). The first field experiment was executed in February to March 1998 at the Mackenzie Delta in the Canadian Arctic as collaboration between JNOC and GSC with the participation of USGS (US Geological Survey) and JAPEX. At that time a well named JAPEX/JNOC/GSC Mallik 2L-38 was drilled/cored/logged through the hydrate layers beneath permafrost1. This research program was carried out to better understand gas hydrate characteristics and to verify the technologies required to evaluate its occurrence in the sediments2.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,613
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle