Image and Imagination: Le mois de la photo à Montréal 2005 (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Image and Imagination: Le mois de la photo à Montréal 2005 Vid Ingelevics (bio) Martha Langford, editor. Image and Imagination: Le mois de la photo à Montréal 2005 McGill-Queen’s University Press. 336. $39.95 Image and Imagination is a substantial publication produced in conjunction with the 2005 version of Le Mois de la Photo à Montréal, a major biennial [End Page 641] featuring Canadian and international artists. It focuses on a specific over-arching theme designated by guest curator Martha Langford as 'Image and Imagination.' The book is structured in three sections, each concentrating on differing aspects of individual or collective imaginative engagement with photographs. There are nine commissioned essays as well as thirty shorter 'curatorial' statements describing specific exhibitions. Langford's thesis is that theories of photography have until now focused on concerns with representation and memory but have not, in a concerted way, taken into account the role of spectatorial imagination in relation to meaning. Taking a logical step almost fifty years after Roland Barthes announced the birth of the reader, Langford proposes the book as an opening salvo in the development of 'a photographic theory of spectatorial experience based on an expanded notion of photographic function – one that recognizes the spectator's part in intention and authorship.' Langford's knowledge, energy, and enthusiasm for her task are impressive. She not only acts as editor but makes numerous contributions herself, penning the introduction, one of the extended essays and most of the curatorial descriptions noted above. The meat of the book for this reviewer lies in the commissioned essays and their illustrations, since the shorter texts (three to four pages each), coupled with a necessarily spare number of reproductions of each artist's works, tend to act more as 'teasers.' While these do sketch out each exhibition's rough outline, they are sometimes not quite long enough to draw out the nuances of each exhibition, or illustrated intensively enough to flesh out each artist's project. This leads to a sense that Image and Imagination is actually two related books woven into one. This occasionally contributes to a slight difficulty in orienting oneself within this hefty book if it isn't approached linearly. Perhaps another model to consider might be a slipcovered two-volume set where the commissioned essays and their accompanying illustrations could be nominally separated from the more catalogue-like functions that the shorter texts and images are attempting to cover. However, these are not fatal criticisms for a publication that has much to offer the reader. The core essays address Langford's stated theme to varying degrees, but all plunge the reader into the often fascinating research and reflection on the medium of photography. Of note in terms of demonstrating the sheer diversity of approaches corralled by Langford are Francine Dagenais's concept of the 'bodily suffix,' a contemplation of the artist's imagination in relation to the prosthetic possibilities offered through state-of-the-art bio-engineering; Geoffrey Batchen's delving into the unexplored territory of the 'bourgeois imagination' lurking behind the huge mid-nineteenth-century commercial success of the carte-de-visite; Kirsty Robertson's consideration of what might be the imaginative role of the photographic documentation of the physical manifestations of the [End Page 642] Global Justice Movement; and, Martyn Jolly's fascinating discussion of nineteenth- and early twentieth-century spirit photography and its 'revival' in the work of certain contemporary artists. This diversity is a strength of the book (producing a stimulating set of readings) but, at the same time, the broadness of the terrain demonstrates the challenges of theorizing a role for 'imagination' in relation to photography that sets it apart from the already well mined territories of representation and memory. Regarding the latter, hinted at by Langford but not pursued, is the question of how we make distinctions between imagination and memory. Imagination would seem to need the bedrock of memory to build upon, and yet memory itself is a faculty that has been theorized as not simply recollective but as a constructive and imaginative act. Also, the predominance of 'theatrical' approaches to photography represented in the book's illustrations means that barely touched upon...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,050 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».