1085. In Vivo Imaging of Microencapsulated Gene Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Microencapsulated cells engineered to secrete therapeutic proteins have been effectively applied in treating several genetic disorders such as dwarfism, lysosomal storage diseases, hemophilia, and cancer in mouse models. While various classes of microcapsules have been developed for use in this type of gene therapy, the most commonly used and studied have been the alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate (APA) microcapsules. Once these microcapsules are administered to an animal, however, the fate of the implanted microcapsules and their engineered-cell payload can only be directly ascertained by surgical retrieval. Our group has previously established a novel method to quantitatively monitor the microcapsules in vivo with MRI by incorporating ferrofluid into the microcapsule. However there is limited availability of MRI for small animal studies and this technique does not provide information about the cells contained in the microcapsule. To overcome these limitations, we have developed a system to track the implanted microcapsules and their cells with in vivo bioluminescent imaging (BLI).We have developed a cell line expressing luciferase (pMONO- Luci & pC3B.sp.Luci with signal peptide) that allows us to monitor microcapsule integrity and encapsulated cell viability in vivo. BLI has become widely available as a research tool, making this technique more accessible than other imaging modalities. In our experiment, luciferase-expressing microencapsulated cells were imaged with a cooled charge-coupled device (CCCD) camera in vitro after exposure to luciferin substrate for 30 seconds, and in vivo after implantation into the peritoneal cavity of BalB/C mice aged 6–8 weeks (3 ml capsules per mouse in 2 ml saline). In vitro experiments showed that capsules loaded in 96-well-plate can be monitored individually and quantitatively, both for single or multi-layered loading. In vivo experiments confirmed that at various time points (4, 24, 48, 72, 96 hrs), with the injection of the substrate luciferin (injected i.p. at 150 mg/kg), the luciferase signal could be detected for the duration of the study (5 days). The strongest signal was seen at 4 hours post- implantation, with a subsequent fivefold decrease by 24 hours. The luciferase signal then increased consistently till the last time point of our study (96 hours) when the signal was 73% of the maximum. We postulate that the decrease of the luciferase signal from 4 hours to 24 hours post-implantation might be due to the initial diffusion of the expressed protein from the transfected cells into the peritoneal fluid and the blood. There was no indication of distribution of luciferase into the organs (liver, spleen, kidney, lung, heart, muscle and brain). The consistent increase of the signal from 24 hours to 96 hours likely reflects the proliferation of the encapsulated cells and increased expressed luciferase.Our data indicates that luciferase could be developed as a marker for microencapsulated cells to monitor the status of microcapsules and encapsulated cells after 24 hours post-implantation. Microencapsulated cells engineered to secrete therapeutic proteins have been effectively applied in treating several genetic disorders such as dwarfism, lysosomal storage diseases, hemophilia, and cancer in mouse models. While various classes of microcapsules have been developed for use in this type of gene therapy, the most commonly used and studied have been the alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate (APA) microcapsules. Once these microcapsules are administered to an animal, however, the fate of the implanted microcapsules and their engineered-cell payload can only be directly ascertained by surgical retrieval. Our group has previously established a novel method to quantitatively monitor the microcapsules in vivo with MRI by incorporating ferrofluid into the microcapsule. However there is limited availability of MRI for small animal studies and this technique does not provide information about the cells contained in the microcapsule. To overcome these limitations, we have developed a system to track the implanted microcapsules and their cells with in vivo bioluminescent imaging (BLI). We have developed a cell line expressing luciferase (pMONO- Luci & pC3B.sp.Luci with signal peptide) that allows us to monitor microcapsule integrity and encapsulated cell viability in vivo. BLI has become widely available as a research tool, making this technique more accessible than other imaging modalities. In our experiment, luciferase-expressing microencapsulated cells were imaged with a cooled charge-coupled device (CCCD) camera in vitro after exposure to luciferin substrate for 30 seconds, and in vivo after implantation into the peritoneal cavity of BalB/C mice aged 6–8 weeks (3 ml capsules per mouse in 2 ml saline). In vitro experiments showed that capsules loaded in 96-well-plate can be monitored individually and quantitatively, both for single or multi-layered loading. In vivo experiments confirmed that at various time points (4, 24, 48, 72, 96 hrs), with the injection of the substrate luciferin (injected i.p. at 150 mg/kg), the luciferase signal could be detected for the duration of the study (5 days). The strongest signal was seen at 4 hours post- implantation, with a subsequent fivefold decrease by 24 hours. The luciferase signal then increased consistently till the last time point of our study (96 hours) when the signal was 73% of the maximum. We postulate that the decrease of the luciferase signal from 4 hours to 24 hours post-implantation might be due to the initial diffusion of the expressed protein from the transfected cells into the peritoneal fluid and the blood. There was no indication of distribution of luciferase into the organs (liver, spleen, kidney, lung, heart, muscle and brain). The consistent increase of the signal from 24 hours to 96 hours likely reflects the proliferation of the encapsulated cells and increased expressed luciferase. Our data indicates that luciferase could be developed as a marker for microencapsulated cells to monitor the status of microcapsules and encapsulated cells after 24 hours post-implantation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».