MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2018943599 · doi:10.1176/pn.41.16.0018a

We Need to Pay More Heed to Eating Disorders

2006· article· en· W2018943599 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Denise Senyk

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEating Disorders and Behaviors
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEating disordersBulimia nervosaAnorexia nervosaCertificationBinge-eating disorderSpecialtyPsychologyPsychiatryBinge eatingRound tableMedicineSession (web analytics)PsychotherapistManagement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article ViewpointsFull AccessWe Need to Pay More Heed to Eating DisordersDenise Senyk, M.D.Denise Senyk, M.D.Published Online:18 Aug 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.41.16.0018aI have noticed that over the past five years in my practice, I am seeing increasing numbers of patients who suffer from eating disorders, often comorbid with other serious psychiatric illness.For most psychiatrists, unless they have chosen a specialty elective in this field, residency training addressing anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, or the nebulous eating disorder NOS is relatively spare. Though there are opportunities for postresidency training in the field of eating disorders, since formal ABPN certification does not exist as it does for geriatric or forensic specialization, for example, there are few fellowships available.This is not surprising given the small number of DSM-IV-TR diagnoses available to psychiatrists in this category.The new APA Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Eating Disorders, Third Edition, was released in July. It highlights the potential leadership role for psychiatrists "within a program or team that includes other physicians, psychologists, registered dietitians, and social workers."If the standing-room only crowd at Dr. Joel Yager's "Focus Live" session on eating disorders at this year's APA annual meeting in Toronto is any indication, I would deduce that many of my colleagues are already being called upon or are ready to offer leadership and expertise in this field. Yager chaired the work group that developed the eating disorders practice guideline.Like many of us outside of academia, I practice in a variety of settings (outpatient, inpatient, residential). In the residential treatment setting for serious and persistent mental illness, I have discovered that close to 25 percent of my patients have a comorbid eating disorder, often with a complex presentation. For example, a woman with schizoaffective disorder, anorexia nervosa, and borderline personality disorder stopped purging, but proceeded to cut her abdomen in an attempt to "cut the ugly fat out" of her body.In an article in May/June issue of Psychosomatic Medicine, Dr. Barton Blinder, founder and chair of the APA Caucus of Psychiatrists Treating Patients With Eating Disorders, reported that 97 percent of patients at an inpatient eating-disorders program had a comorbid Axis I diagnosis. In this sample there were more diagnoses of psychosis in patients with anorexia than those with bulimia.Beyond the traditional eating-disorder diagnoses, we now have the epidemic of obesity with which to contend. The advent of second-generation antipsychotics has added not only an effective addition to our pharmacologic tool chest for both psychotic and bipolar spectrum disorders, but also an additional responsibility to monitor our patients for metabolic syndrome. This increased monitoring of our patients' weights, BMI, lipids, and glucose tolerance is helping us to identify and manage weight-related pathology more effectively. In fact, many, including Dr. Renu Kotwal, believe that obesity should be considered a psychiatric disorder. He found that 87.2 percent of bipolar patients treated at a weight-management program had an eating disorder, compared with 71.3 percent of patients without bipolar disorder. The relationship between obesity, binge-eating disorder, and severe and persistent mental illness is fertile ground for new research.There are several excellent professional organizations that focus on eating disorders; however, they are primarily for either researchers or are interdisciplinary in nature. As the leaders of eating-disorder treatment teams, it is imperative that, as psychiatrists, we continue to organize around the issues of residency and fellowship training in this important area, encouraging and supporting psychiatrists in eating disorders research, access to care, diagnostic and treatment advances, clinical excellence, and advocacy for our patients.The APA Caucus of Psychiatrists Treating Patients With Eating Disorders will meet at the 2006 Institute of Psychiatric Services on Saturday, October 7, from 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. in the Jolson Room on the ninth floor of the Marriott Marquis. Please join us. ▪Denise Senyk, M.D., is in private practice in Bucks County, Pa., and medical director of Project Transition. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,057
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetEating Disorders and BehaviorsTravaux en français237 207