MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2019262376 · doi:10.4043/18415-ms

Hurricanes Ivan, Katrina, and Rita:Phenomenal Activity or Signs of Things To Come?

2006· article· en· W2019262376 sur OpenAlexaff
Cerian Hebert

Notice bibliographique

RevueOffshore Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Établissements canadiensImpact
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHurricane katrinaNatural disasterGeographyMeteorology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract For most of the last three decades, the northern Gulf of Mexico has remained relatively free of large and powerful hurricanes. Basically, the tropical waters were relatively cool from 1970-1994. But in 1995, the pattern changed, and the Atlantic Basin heated up in more ways than one. Hurricanes have become more numerous and more powerful in recent years. A normal hurricane season would have 10 named storms, 6 of which would become hurricanes and two of those major hurricanes. There were 15 named storms in 2004, including 9 hurricanes and 6 major hurricanes. The 2005 season broke almost every record for activity with 27 named storms, 15 hurricanes, and 7 major hurricanes. The outlook for 2006 and beyond is not good. The recent pattern of significantly increased activity may well persist for decades. It's just a matter of time before another large and powerful hurricane impacts the northwest Gulf of Mexico. Introduction The 2004 hurricane season marked a significant upswing in major hurricane activity in the Gulf of Mexico. Massive Hurricane Ivan tracked across the central Gulf of Mexico in mid September. Ivan's winds of 135 to 150 mph generated some very large waves. Buoy 42040 located 64nm south of Dauphin Island, AL recorded significant waves as high as 50- 60 feet, and maximum waves were estimated to be in the 80 to 90 foot range. These waves wrought havoc on platforms off the southeast Louisiana coast, however it wasn't so much the intensity of Ivan's core as much as the great expanse of hurricane-force winds which produced such large waves. Figure 1: Buoy Locations in Northwest Gulf (available in fullpaper) As Ivan plowed through the drilling and production areas off the southeast Louisiana coast, its winds had dropped considerably, down to a Category 3 on the Saffir-Simpson scale. Theoretically, a Category 3 hurricane shouldn't have caused so much damage. Clearly, the Saffir-Simpson scale was not the best measurement of how potentially damaging a hurricane like Ivan might be because Ivan was no ‘normal’ Category 3 hurricane - its hurricane-force winds extended 100 or more miles from its center. It had been many years since such a large hurricane had impacted the waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Climatologically, hurricanes as large as Ivan are rare in the central and northern Gulf of Mexico, occurring perhaps once every few decades or longer. So it was generally thought to be unlikely that the 2005 hurricane season would be as active as far as the Gulf of Mexico was concerned. Such thoughts turned out to be quite wrong. 2005 Hurricane Season By all measurements, the 2005 hurricane season was the most active in recorded history, which extends more than 150 years into the past. With a total of 27 named storms, including fifteen hurricanes, seven major hurricanes, and four category 5 hurricanes, the 2005 hurricane season will be longremembered as the most destructive season on record, both offshore and inland across the northern Gulf of Mexico.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,116
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOffshore Technology ConferenceMême sujetTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchTravaux en français237 207