Abstract S3-3: The UK TACT2 Trial: comparison of standard vs accelerated epirubicin in patients requiring chemotherapy for early breast cancer (EBC) (CRUK/05/019)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: TACT2, a multicentre randomized phase III trial in patients with node +ve or high risk node -ve invasive EBC with E-CMF as control (Poole NEJM 2006), tests two hypotheses in a 2×2 factorial design: A) accelerated epirubicin (aE) improves outcomes compared to standard epirubicin (E) (CALGB9741 Citron JCO 2003); and B) capecitabine (X) gives similar efficacy but preferential side-effect profile to CMF. Here we focus on the impact of accelerating epirubicin treatment on patient outcome. Tolerability and toxicity of this regimen have already been presented (Cameron 2010, SABCS); 33/4391 pts did not start chemotherapy. 4261 (97%) completed the initial 4 cycles (E 2143 (96%), aE 2118 (98%)) with RDI >85% for E 2061 (93%) and aE 1985 (91%). Serious CTCAE toxicity was less common with aE compared with E, however patients report poorer global QL, fatigue & role function which does not appear to be explained by impact on daily activities due to individual side-effects. Patients & Methods: Between December 2005 and December 2008, 4391 patients (4371 women, 20 men) were randomized to receive either E (100mg/m2 × 4) q3wk or aE (100mg/m2 × 4 plus pegfilgrastim, 6mg d2) q2wk followed by classical CMF q4wk × 4 or X (2500mg/m2/day × 14) q3wk × 4. Other adjuvant treatment was delivered according to local practice (HER2+ve – sequential trastuzumab for 1 year from June 2006; ER/PgR+ve - endocrine therapy for 5 years). Tumor blocks were collected prospectively to enable central biomarker testing. Median age of patients was 52 years (IQR 46–59). 53% patients had node +ve disease; 59% had tumors >2cm; 57% were grade 3. According to local assessment, of 4366 patients where both ER and HER2 status were known, 60% had ER+ve/HER2-ve tumors, 19% HER2+ve, 21% ER-ve/HER2-ve. Primary endpoint was time to recurrence (TTR), defined as time to loco-regional or distant relapse, or breast cancer-death. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), tolerability of regimens and quality of life. TACT2 has over 90% power to detect a clinically meaningful 4% difference in TTR between standard and accelerated epirubicin schedules (from 80% to 84% at 5 years). Survival estimates will be compared using stratified log-rank tests and Cox regression. Results: At 1st June 2012, median follow up was 49 months (interquartile range: 46–60) with 553 TTR events reported. The Independent Data Monitoring Committee consider these data sufficiently mature for presentation of analyses relating to the accelerated epirubicin hypothesis. A further data snapshot, after query resolution, for the main analysis will be taken in Q3 2012. Data to be presented, by treatment group, include TTR, DFS, OS, late toxicity and pre-planned subgroup analyses according to ER, PgR and HER2 status and Ki67 levels. Discussion: TACT2 will provide a definitive analysis to confirm or refute benefits previously reported for accelerating anthracycline chemotherapy in early breast cancer including, via pre-planned subgroup analyses, exploration of the potential benefits in phenotypic subtypes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-3.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».