Ottawa Little Theatre, the "Original Regional": Canada's Longest-Running English Language Theatre Turns 100
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ottawa Little Theatre, the "Original Regional":Canada's Longest-Running English Language Theatre Turns 100 Robin C. Whittaker (bio) The health of a city's theatre culture can be productively articulated by examining its nonprofessionalizing community theatres. Conversely, healthy community theatres are signs of a city's dedication to the production and reception of theatre among nonspecialist practitioners. This is how we can gauge the extent to which the practice of theatre has meaning for people who have a range of experiences and dedications, but have not—or have not yet—committed themselves to "the profession." Moreover, as I argued in an earlier article for CTR, "Walterdale Theatre Associates and the In(ter)vention of the Audience," a community theatre is a site for the "training" of theatre-literate audiences that attend both professional and nonprofessionalizing theatre (Whittaker 37). Indeed, the serious study of Canadian community theatres and their participants across decades traces their cities' theatre ecologies, and the exchange of performance knowledges within these ecologies, in ways that similar studies of professional theatres cannot. This is true not only because of the vast number of Canadians who participate in nonprofessionalizing community theatres (there are hundreds in Canada), but also because these are our longest-running theatre companies. Ottawa Little Theatre (OLT) is a case in point. On 15 November 2012, the company will celebrate the one hundredth anniversary of its first production, making it Canada's longest-running English-language theatre company. According to OLT executive director Lynn McGuigan, each year more than fifty thousand people attend OLT shows; another ten to twelve thousand attend events organized by groups who rent space in the building. From a database of five hundred volunteers, about 150-200 work with OLT in a given year. Eight of the theatre's ten annual productions run for sixteen performances over three weeks; the two summer productions run two weeks each. With the exception of a couple of recent project grants and one operating grant related to the anniversary season, government funding for OLT has been limited to capital grants. Thus, for a century, subscriptions, box office income, and donations have funded OLT's sizeable operating expenses. Season subscribers may choose to become voting members of the company simply by indicating their interest. OLT's nomenclature, like that of most "community theatres," has changed over the years. Even while retaining the "Little Theatre" name, OLT has shed the amateur terminology in favour of community, not only because the word amateur [End Page 62] has taken on negative connotations over the years, but also because the company has, for the past forty years, operated more as a hybrid. Explains McGuigan, We promote ourselves as a place at which all of the creative and crew functions are done by volunteers .... We have both "amateurs" and "professionals" in our company. So we tend not to use the "amateur" word a lot because then we're only talking about part of our company. So instead we talk about a company of volunteers. All of the directing, design, acting, and running crew functions are filled by volunteers. The only exception is that we have a house stage manager who is the senior paid staff member on site during performances. We have seven full-time staff in total, and I think that differentiates us from a lot of community theatres .... One actor in the community said to us that they would love to do a show here but can't because we want a professional commitment on a volunteer basis, and I thought that was a good way of framing it. People really do have to be committed and want to spend time in the theatre to volunteer here. This sizeable number of full-time staff—in addition to about twenty part-time staff who include drama camp and youth theatre instructors as well as front-of-house and box office personnel—are necessary, McGuigan explains, in order to maintain OLT's pace of ten productions each year: "Our theatre is in use for fifty weeks of the year now, so that changes the level of operation that you have." Among the tens of thousands of people who walk through OLT...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,022 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,077 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».