Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the previous issue of the Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME), Drs. Regina Schoenfeld-Tacher and Henry Baker introduced a new Special Topic focused on Educational Theory and Practice. The quality and broad relevance of the manuscripts submitted in response to their invitation to authors was impressive, and the number of submissions substantially exceeded the space available. With the continued assistance of Dr. Schoenfeld-Tacher, this issue continues that Special Topic with articles that are again noteworthy not only for quality but also for the significance of the contemporary educational issues that they address. The initiation of this Special Topic was yet another example of the exemplary leadership and guidance provided to the JVME by Dr. Henry Baker during his long tenure as Editor-in-Chief. I am indebted to him, to the JVME Editorial Board, and to the many JVME reviewers for maintaining a high standard of quality over the years. I also thank the Board of Directors of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC) for their intellectual, philosophical, and, critically, financial support of the JVME. Finally, the University of Toronto Press continues to be a superb publishing partner for the JVME, and I am highly appreciative of the professionalism, expertise, and creativity of its staff. Academic veterinary medicine, and the profession of veterinary medicine at large, faces many pressing challenges as well as equally striking opportunities. As the premier, peer-refereed journal focused on innovation and advances in the broad field of veterinary medical education, the JVME is a critical resource at a pivotal time. The JVME is extraordinarily well positioned and equipped to provide the new knowledge in education that is so greatly needed, but also to serve as a venue for an informed and critical assessment of key issues that face academic veterinary medicine, now and in the future. It is my privilege to serve as Editor-in-Chief, and I look forward to working with a remarkable team to carry on the tradition of the JVME. It begs the obvious to say that we share a common goal of making the JVME highly successful, as can be defined by many conventional publishing metrics. However, our goal must be much broader than success alone. Albert Einstein is famously quoted for his cautionary statement ‘‘Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.’’ Applied to a journal rather than an individual, that statement encapsulates my personal goal for the JVME, a goal I know that you share. It is a pleasure and honor for me to work with you toward the attainment of that goal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».