Poster Session I, July 14th 2010 — Abstracts Design of an ergometer to train and evaluate elite crosscountry skiiers
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sport ergometers offer a reasonable alternative for semi-specific training conditions as it provides a sheltered environment to practice. Their additional values from in situ performances are mainly due to real time feedback of mechanical variables as the external power generated by athlete at one (or more) contact with the ergometer (e.g. handle power while rowing an ergometer). These variables are mainly recorded using force and displacement sensors. As a result, in many sport (e;g. rowing, cycling, running), these machine are also used for performance assessment and both physiological and biomedical research program. However, the design of a specific ergometer has to reproduce the dynamics of the in situ movement for an accurate mechanical analysis. A first step in such a way is to analyse the three-dimensional kinematics in order that the ergometer design simulate accurately the kinematic performed in situ. In cross-country skiing, the kinematics observed while skiing the actually available ergometers is far from the one performed during in situ conditions. Thus, the mechanical parameters measured while skiing these ergometers are not pertinent to analyze and discriminate the performance produce by elite athletes. This work presents an approach based on a 3D kinematics analysis to design an innovative ergometer fully instrumented to acutely train and evaluate elite cross-country skiers. 3D kinematics analysis of in situ skating, performed using three video cameras showed characteristic 3D trajectories of the stick during the contact period with the snow. The ergometer was design to reproduce this specific kinematics (two specific phases) by adding one dof in translation of the contact point between the rope with the ergometer. This rope connects skier’s hand to an airbraked flywheel to reproduced the resistance. A selfrecoiling system allows to perform the following skating cycle. An instrumentation coupled with a specific interface allows real time feedback of the power generated by skier at each hand. During the last two years, this ergometer was skiing by the french national teams to prepare Vancouver 2010. Further investigations must be undertaken to support the accuracy of this ergometer with in situ conditions and to still improve his design.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle