MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2020715904 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.113.113027

Endogenous Folate Accumulation in Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos and Its Epigenetic Implications

2013· letter· en· W2020715904 sur OpenAlexaff
Mellissa R.W. Mann, Andrew J. Watson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiology of Reproduction · 2013
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Établissements canadiensChildren’s Health Research InstituteLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyEpigeneticsEmbryoEndogenyAndrologyCell biologyBlastocystGeneticsEmbryogenesisEndocrinologyGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

During mammalian development, chromatin is dynamically reprogrammed first in developing gametes and then after fertilization in the preimplantation embryo [1, 2]. In gametes, following an erasure phase that removes somatic DNA methylation, sex-specific DNA methylation is acquired. For female germ cells, this acquisition of methylation occurs in the growing oocyte, with an increasing progression of DNA methylation coincident with increasing oocyte size [1]. By the time the oocyte is fully grown, acquisition of DNA methylation is complete. During preimplantation development, DNA methylation is maintained primarily at imprinted genes and repetitive elements during global methylation erasure. This is followed by initiation of de novo DNA methylation late in preimplantation development [1]. During these chromatin remodeling periods, dynamic changes in histone methylation are also occurring. Importantly, these methylation patterns are critical to the overall health of gametes and embryos [1–4]. Both DNA and histone methylation are catalyzed by methyltransferases, which transfer a methyl group from the universal donor, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), to CpG dinucleotides or histone tails [3–5]. Production of SAM is dependent on the 1-carbon folate pathway [3–5]. Thus, folates play a fundamental role in regulating DNA and histone methylation [3, 4]. In keeping with the critical reprogramming events described above, folate accumulation during oocyte and preimplantation development likely is essential to foster correct DNA and histone methylation patterns during gametogenesis and early development. Folates are essential nutrients that are acquired from our diet [3, 4]. Thus, a key question is how the oocyte and early embryo acquire and take up their folate pools. This question was address by Kooistra et al. [5] in their paper ‘‘Folate Transport in Mouse Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes and Preimplantation Embryos’’ published in this issue of Biology of Reproduction. Using gene expression studies, Kooistra et al. [5] show that mouse cumulus-oocyte complexes and oocytes harbor transcripts for the reduced folate carrier SLC19A1, an anion exchanger. In preimplantation embryos, Slc19a1 transcript abundance is very low due to the lack of embryonic gene activation. By comparison, folate receptor FOLR1 mRNA was present in preimplantation embryos beginning at the 2-cell stage but was lacking in oocytes and zygotes. This ying-yang expression pattern indicates that two distinct mechanisms may be operating in cumulus-oocyte complexes and preimplantation embryos [5]. To functionally characterize SLC19A1 and FOLR1 activity in cumulus-oocyte complexes, germinal vesicle oocytes, and mouse preimplantation embryos, transport experiments were employed to measure uptake of folates and the antifolate methotrexate, whereas biochemical inhibitors were used to distill the uptake mechanisms. The results indicate that folate transport occurs predominately through SLC19A1 in cumulusoocyte complexes but that FOLR1 is the principal uptake mechanism in embryos from the 2-cell through blastocyst stages. However, most interesting are the final experiments showing that SLC19A1 regulates cumulus cell folate uptake, with little to no uptake in fully grown oocytes. Thus, we are left with an intriguing question: What is the origin of endogenous folates in oocytes and zygotes? A careful look at the methods shows that fully grown oocytes were analyzed by Kooistra et al. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that oocyte folate accumulation must occur during the early stages of folliculogenesis. Experiments now need to examine growing oocytes to determine when and through what mechanism folate uptake occurs. We are also left with the intriguing paradox that in vitro embryo development often occurs in non-folate supplemented culture medium. Does this mean that the early embryo relies on oocyte folate stores? And if so, why do early embryos have functional FOLR1 folate uptake? Future studies will also need to address whether variation in folate store accumulation is an important determinant of oocyte maturation and eventual embryonic developmental competence. We must also consider the implication of the Kooistra et al. study on DNA and histone methylation. With regard to DNA methylation in fully grown oocytes, acquisition would be complete. Thus, there may be no further need for folate uptake in fully grown oocytes. However, what would be the ramifications if oocytes failed to store sufficient levels of folates? One repercussion of reduced folate stores during the methylation acquisition phase in growing oocytes may be aberrant establishment of imprinted methylation. Interestingly, we have observed that initiation of methylation acquisition is impaired at the imprinted Peg1 gene in connexin 37-null oocytes [6]. We postulated that this may be due to reduced stores of a critical metabolite normally transported from granulosa cells to the oocyte via gap junctions. Another Correspondence: E-mail: mmann22@uwo.ca

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,188
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,817

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBiology of ReproductionMême sujetEpigenetics and DNA MethylationTravaux en français237 207