MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2021291206 · doi:10.1353/can.2012.0025

Re-imagining Ukrainian Canadians: History, Politics and Identity (review)

2012· article· en· W2021291206 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Dennis Molinaro

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUkrainianIdentity (music)PoliticsGender studiesSociologyMedia studiesHistoryPolitical scienceLawAestheticsArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Re-imagining Ukrainian Canadians: History, Politics and Identity Dennis Molinaro Re-imagining Ukrainian Canadians: History, Politics and Identity. Rhonda L. Hinther and Jim Mocharuk, eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011. Pp. 494, $80.00 In Re-imagining Ukrainian Canadians: History, Politics and Identity, editors Rhonda Hinther and Jim Mochoruk and their contributors seek to challenge the perception of Ukrainian-Canadian history as the story of hardy settlers in 'sheepskin coats' who settled the vastness of the Canadian West in the Sifton era. This popular image and the perception of Ukrainians as 'dangerous foreigners' tied to radical leftist politics, they argue, have skewed the diverse and rich history of Ukrainians in Canada. This is certainly true, although the topic has been addressed in various ways over the years. The works of Frances Swyripa, Orest Martynowych, Lubomyr Luciuk, and Stella Hryniuk throughout the 1990s all contributed to diversifying and complicating our understandings of Ukrainian-Canadian identity. These authors moved the discussions surrounding Ukrainian identity away from seeing Ukrainians as rugged, homesteading pioneers and instead focused on the role of women in the community and the urban lives of Ukrainian Canadians. Luciuk and Hryniuk, in their edited collection Canada's [End Page 332] Ukrainians: Negotiating an Identity, focused specifically on how Ukrainian identity was not fixed but continually remade in Canada from the days of the earliest Ukrainian immigrants to the present. Hinther and Mochoruk acknowledge that 'this collection does not pretend to break completely from past treatments of Ukrainian-Canadian history.' Rather, they present the collection as a 'second wave' of scholarship that seeks to further build on what has already been done. It is perfectly acceptable to build on past scholarship, and their collection certainly succeeds in greatly expanding and diversifying our knowledge of Ukrainian-Canadian history. The collection offers a tremendously varied look at the Ukrainian community from authors with diverse backgrounds, only some of whom are academics. Divided into five parts, the book presents a multitude of perspectives on Ukrainians, from 'Intellectuals' to 'Everyday People' and even 'Diplomacy and International Concerns.' In the section entitled 'New Approaches to Old Questions,' Hinther persuasively argues that the decline of the Ukrainian-Canadian left in the post-war period was linked to deep-seated gender and intergenerational divisions that privileged the old-guard male activist within the community, and excluded immigrant women and Canadian-born Ukrainians. Other chapters also highlight the intersections between the Ukrainian community and Canadian society and reveal tensions within the Ukrainian community itself. For instance, Ledohowski's chapter examines the generational transition from 'being' Ukrainian to 'feeling' Ukrainian, and Martynowych's piece looks at Ukrainian war veterans who sympathized with Nazi Germany during the 1930s and remained largely indifferent to the suffering of their Jewish victims. Rounding out the collection, Zembrzycki provides a fascinating study of domestic abuse and murder, an oft-neglected topic in immigration histories, successfully demonstrating that in the Ukrainian-Canadian community 'morality was not only gendered but also socially constructed along ethnic lines.' While the collection certainly provides a deeper appreciation of the diversity of Ukrainian life, many chapters suffer from being overly insular. Mochoruk's chapter, for instance, examines the long-standing rift that emerged between the Ukrainian Farmer Labour Temple Association (UFLTA) and the Communist Party of Canada (CPC). This rift was, in his view, long-standing and largely due to the ways in which UFLTA members saw themselves not just as members of the Comintern but as Ukrainian communists. Yet Mochoruk does not venture beyond the Ukrainians in making this point or in his discussion of how the UFLTA halls fulfilled a cultural and political purpose. There is [End Page 333] no comparison between the Ukrainians and other groups such as the Finns or Croatians where studies have come to similar conclusions. However, the chapter, which Mochoruk presents as a preliminary study, does help historians better understand the dynamics of the conflict between the UFLTA and the CPC. In sum, this collection greatly expands our knowledge of Ukrainian-Canadian history and offers an even more thorough look at this diverse and culturally rich group. It will certainly be valuable for scholars looking to expand their historical knowledge on...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,513
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,969

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,010
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207