MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2021428797 · doi:10.1353/chq.2007.0022

Hide-and-Seek with Angels: A Life of J. M. Barrie (review)

2007· article· en· W2021428797 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Anita Tarr

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren's Literature Association quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePoetry Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyPortraitArtArt historyLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Hide-and-Seek with Angels: A Life of J. M. Barrie Anita Tarr (bio) Hide-and-Seek with Angels: A Life of J. M. Barrie. By Lisa Chaney. New York: St. Martin’s, 2005. Lisa Chaney offers an astute assessment of one of the most perplexing literary figures as she tries to differentiate between what J. M. Barrie says he did and what he actually did, between the iconic image he created for himself and the real man. This is a daunting task because of the many personalities, roles, masks, and characters he lived through. Still, Chaney manages to show readers aspects of his prismatic, chameleon-like nature—he was not always admirable but always interesting. This new biography is more solid than the man was; Chaney depends on past biographer/critics such as Denis Mackail, Roger Lancelyn Green, Andrew Birkin, and R. S. D. Jack, along with other biographies, but she has also done her archival research, probing Barrie's original notebooks and manuscripts and letters written by Barrie and his contemporaries. As a result, Chaney's biography is both broad and specific, a satisfying read for either a novice or an aficionado of Barrie studies. Early on Chaney warns us that Barrie played fast and loose with facts and, later, of the lesson she herself learned: "It was always dangerous to take him too literally" (333). Unlike others who have taken Barrie at his supposedly autobiographical word, Chaney offers us a much more sympathetic portrait of the people who influenced him most—his parents. Instead of a jealous shrew, Barrie's mother is described as small and frail but strong-willed, suffering grievously from two of her children's deaths before Barrie was even born. His father, often portrayed as a pathetic and underemployed weaver, was instead industrious and foresighted, as he soon was able to employ his own weavers and later became a clerk, allowing him to move his family into much better quarters. Both parents, being devotees of their Scottish hero Thomas Carlyle, valued education highly, and all of their children attended school. Perhaps because Chaney is fascinated but not blinded by Barrie's charm, she is able to see more clearly not just Barrie's parents but also Mary Ansell, his wife, who, if not long-suffering, was at least incredibly patient and gracious through her husband's many frequent flirtations (that is, until the 1909 divorce), especially with Sylvia Llewelyn Davies. Sylvia is brought down from her pedestal somewhat, though Chaney admits that Barrie put her into an impossible situation by intervening in her marriage and family—but she let him. Barrie's growing financial prosperity allowed him to shower his friends with gifts and [End Page 65] money, but often there were strings attached. Although he became guardian of the Llewelyn Davies boys after first their father and then their mother succumbed to cancer, in his will Barrie declined to leave the surviving three more than a few thousand pounds, bearing a grudge against them for not completely devoting themselves to him once they were grown up. Rather, Lady Cynthia Asquith, secretary and confidante and a more independent version of Sylvia, inherited the rights to all of his published works, except those regarding Peter Pan, which were famously given to the Great Ormond Street Hospital. Barrie set the standards for all of his relationships, including his friends; those who did not abide by those standards found him to be difficult indeed, and those who stayed closest to him learned to tolerate those difficulties. Chaney shuns psychoanalytical interpretations, not dwelling on the seminal event of his brother David's death, nor on his unresolved Oedipal problems, nor on the accusations of pedophilia (if Barrie was guilty, then all of Edwardian society was also guilty), nor on his undoubtedly asexual character. She does, however, suggest that Barrie was bipolar, evidenced by his intense headaches and long periods of dark depression, contrasted with other periods of hyperactivity, especially during his early adulthood when he wrote ceaselessly. One of the most interesting sections of the book details Barrie's literary apprenticeship, which anticipates so many of the complexities we find in Peter Pan. While a...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,591
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,623

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,200
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren's Literature Association quarterlyMême sujetPoetry Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207