The Quality of Teaching and Learning towards the Satisfaction among the University Students
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the students’ perception of the quality of teaching and learning and their satisfaction in a great university in Indonesia, which was very important in the effort of upgrading the quality of higher education. A survey research involving the sample of 387 students was conducted. The research instruments of the study regarding the quality of teaching and learning consisted of aspects such as the courses, lecturers’ motivation, instructional design, relationship among students, relationship between students and lecturers, task assignment, lecturers’ efficiency, evaluation, obstacles and restraints, as well as the instrument for measuring students’ satisfaction. The research findings were analyzed using the descriptive statistics and inferential statistics such as T-Test, correlation, and regression. The findings showed that students’ perception of the quality of teaching and learning was at the moderate level, and students’ satisfaction was also at the moderate level. Based on the inferential statistics, it was indicated that there was a difference in the perception of the quality of teaching and learning concerning the gender, study period, and field of study. Similarly, there was also a difference in students’ satisfaction based on gender, study period, and field of study. The correlation analysis showed that students’ perception of the quality of teaching and learning had a positive relationship with their satisfaction, whereas the results of the regression test presented the existence of the 9 dimensions of positive contributions of the quality of teaching and learning in relation to students’ satisfaction. The study recommendation is that the university find out about students’ needs in the teaching and learning processes, including the physical needs or methods of generating a better relationship between the students and university as well as among students in order to enhance the quality of higher education. Thus, the main implication of this study regarding the education discipline was the discovery of the status of the quality of teaching and learning in an educational institution as the principal factor of the increment in students’ satisfaction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,023 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,017 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle