MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2021832736 · doi:10.1111/nph.12704

Mitochondrion‐to‐plastid <scp>DNA</scp> transfer: it happens

2014· letter· en· W2021832736 sur OpenAlexaffabout
David Roy Smith

Notice bibliographique

RevueNew Phytologist · 2014
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlastidMitochondrial DNAGenomeBiologyNuclear DNANuclear geneDNAMitochondrionGeneticsGeneChloroplast

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When different genetic compartments exist in close proximity to one another there is the potential for intercompartmental DNA transfer. Land plants and eukaryotic algae exemplify this point. Within each of their cells there are three distinct genomes: nuclear, mitochondrial, and plastid, which are made up of nucDNA, mtDNA, and ptDNA, respectively. The sequencing of these different DNAs has uncovered staggering amounts of intracellular gene transfer (Timmis et al., 2004; Kleine et al., 2009). For example, the nuclear genomes of many seed plants, including rice and corn, contain thousands of nucleotides of recent mitochondrial and plastid origin, most of which are nonfunctional (Hazkani-Covo et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2011). Similarly, seed plant mitochondrial genomes have accumulated large amounts of DNA from the neighboring plastid and nuclear genomes (Wang et al., 2007; Smith, 2011). More than 5% of the cumber (Cucumis sativus) and zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) mitochondrial genomes, for instance, are represented by plastid- and nuclear-derived sequences (Alverson et al., 2010, 2011). Given the prevalence of intracellular DNA migration into the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of seed plants, one might expect their plastid genomes to also harbor large amounts of horizontally acquired DNA. But the opposite is true. Seed plant plastid genomes, and ptDNAs as a whole, are surprisingly devoid of either mitochondrial- or nuclear-derived DNA (Richardson & Palmer, 2007; Smith, 2011). This observation has led to the assumption that the intracellular transfer of mtDNA or nucDNA to plastids does not occur – a theory backed by the observed lack of an efficient DNA uptake system within plastids (Bock, 2010), but see Cerutti & Jagendorf (1995). Moreover, plastids, unlike mitochondria, do not regularly undergo fusion event, thus, limiting the potential for foreign DNA to sneak in. Recent data from the organelle genomes of carrots and milkweeds, however, are changing this view, proving that mitochondrion-to-chloroplast genetic transfer does occur and that plastids are not as impenetrable to foreign DNA as previously thought. Three years after it was sequenced, the plastid genome of carrot, Daucus carota, was unexpectedly found (during a cursory blast analysis) to have a c. 1.5 kb region of potential mitochondrial origin (Goremykin et al., 2009). This region, which is dubbed the D. carota Mitochondrial-like Plastid (DcMP) sequence and located in the rps12-trnV intergenic spacer, is similar to conserved coding and noncoding segments of seed plant mtDNA, including cox1, suggesting it arose through mtDNA transfer to the plastid (Fig. 1). Support for this hypothesis came from the sequencing of the carrot mitochondrial genome and the discovery that it too contains a complete, but fragmented, DcMP sequence (Iorizzo et al., 2012a). Further analyses revealed that diverse members of the carrot family (Apiaceae) contain a large piece of DcMP within their mtDNA, but that only Daucus species and their close relative cumin (Cuminum cyminum) have a plastid DcMP. Together, these observations were taken as proof that a mitochondrial-located DcMP was present in the ancestor of the Apiaceae and subsequently spread to the plastid genome in the common ancestor of Daucus and Cuminum (Iorizzo et al., 2012b) (Fig. 1). Complicating the story is that DcMP, apart from having a short cox1-like segment, shows little similarity to other sequences in GenBank, making it difficult to trace its origin within the Apiaceae, and leaving open the possibility that it began in the nuclear compartment and was then transferred independently to the mitochondrial and plastid genomes (Iorizzo et al., 2012a). Moreover, within the carrot mitochondrial genome, DcMP is fragmented and scrambled into three pieces, two of which are 80 kb apart from one another (Fig. 1). Assuming that DcMP migrated from the mtDNA to the ptDNA as an intact element and in a single event, its fragmentation within the mitochondrial genome must have occurred post-migration, most likely through mtDNA recombination (Iorizzo et al., 2012a), which frequently occurs in seed plants (Alverson et al., 2011). DcMP has some characteristics resembling those of non-LTR retrotransposons, including an open reading frame for a putative reverse transcriptase (Iorizzo et al., 2012b), and it is speculated that DcMP retrotransposed from the mitochondrial to the plastid genome – a scenario that could explain the short direct repeats bookending its ptDNA sequence. Some non-LTR elements target tRNA-coding regions, which may be why DcMP is located upstream of trnV within the plastid genome. There is also reason to believe that DcMP is acting as a surrogate promoter for trnV, having replaced the original promoter upon insertion (Iorizzo et al., 2012b). If true, it would mean that a mitochondrial-derived sequence is playing a functional role within a plastid genome. A separate example of a DNA transfer from a mitochondrial to a plastid genome has come from the common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca, which belongs to a well-studied and large family of flowering plants called the Apocynaceae. Similar to the situation for D. carota, the A. syriaca plastid genome sequence was published and available in GenBank for over a year (Straub et al., 2011) before it was discovered to have a 2.4 kb mtDNA-like insert, located in the rps2-rpoC2 intergenic spacer (Ku et al., 2013) (Fig. 1). But unlike the case for carrot, the putative transferred element contains an intact exon for a mitochondrial ribosomal protein (rpl2), leaving little doubt about its mtDNA origin (Straub et al., 2013). Assembly of the A. syriaca mitochondrial genome confirmed that the rpl2-containing segment of the plastid genome does indeed match to milkweed mtDNA, specifically to the second exon of rpl2 and its flanking noncoding sequence, as well as to a piece of mtDNA from a completely different region (Straub et al., 2013). The sequence identity between the mitochondrial and plastid versions of rpl2 is high (c. 92%), but the plastid copy has a nonsense mutation, resulting in a premature stop codon and implying that it is a pseudogene, which is consistent with its observed low levels of transcription relative to other plastid-located genes (Straub et al., 2013). Remarkably, the sequence bordering the rpl2 insert in the A. syriaca plastid genome, including a portion of rpoC2, is present in the milkweed mitochondrial genome immediately adjacent to the genuine rpl2, meaning that the fragment of mtDNA that migrated to the plastid (rpl2) sits beside a section of ptDNA that migrated to the mitochondrion (rpoC2), and vice versa (Fig. 1). Using PCR and next-generation sequencing, Straub et al. (2013) uncovered an rpl2 insert in the ptDNAs from other members of the Apocynaceae, and ultimately traced its origin back to a single mitochondrion-to-plastid DNA transfer event in the common ancestor of the Asclepiadeae and Eustegia (Fig. 1). They also found within various apocynacean species a mitochondrial-located rpoC2, which, as it turns out, is more broadly distributed within the group than the rpl2 insert, suggesting that the transfer of rpoC2 from the plastid to the mitochondrion predates the mtDNA-to-ptDNA rpl2 migration. In fact, the close proximity of the mitochondrial rpl2 to a ptDNA-derived sequence might have facilitated its eventual integration into the plastid genome via repair of a double-stranded break by homologous recombination between mtDNA and ptDNA (Straub et al., 2013). In light of these new data from carrots and milkweeds, it is safe to say that mitochondrion-to-plastid DNA transfer does occur (but the reverse process occurs much more frequently). It is still not known in either of these cases, however, how the mtDNA entered the plastid or how it integrated into the plastid genome, be it by retrotransposition, homologous recombination, or some other process. The complete plastid genome sequences of D. carota and A. syriaca were both available for some time before the proposed mtDNA insert was discovered, hinting that there are likely other published ptDNA sequences with undiscovered mitochondrial-derived regions. Of the six possible directions of intracellular genetic transfer within a plastid-containing species only one – nuclear-to-plastid DNA migration – remains to be described. But if the study of organelle genetics has taught us anything, it is to expect the unexpected. Next-generation sequencing techniques have greatly increased the rate at which plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear genomes are becoming available. Soon we will be inundated with unprecedented amounts of organelle genomic data, some of which will most certainly contain more examples of foreign DNA within plastid genomes. D.R.S. is supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,192
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations54
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNew PhytologistMême sujetPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsTravaux en français237 207