MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2022127291 · doi:10.4103/2045-8932.87291

The World of Pulmonary Vascular Disease

2011· article· en· W2022127291 sur OpenAlex
Jason X.‐J. Yuan, Nicholas W. Morrell, S Harikrishnan, Ghazwan Butrous

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePulmonary Circulation · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute for Health and Care Research
Mots-clésMedicineIgnorancePulmonary hypertensionDiseaseDistribution (mathematics)PathologyCardiologyPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The world of pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) is lopsided in this sense: those nations that have the highest numbers of PVD researchers have the lowest number of PVD patients. We ran a PubMed search for PVD researchers and found that, of all the authors of published articles on PVD, 90.3% were from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan, while those from all the rest of the world totaled only 9.7% (Fig. 1). Meanwhile, schistosomiasis is very rare in North America, but is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension worldwide.[1] In addition, the burden of HIV-related pulmonary hypertension is likely to be far greater in Africa.[2] The global distribution of researchers studying pulmonary vascular disease. (a) Intensity map depicting the number of researchers in different countries represented by relative color intensity. (b) The number of papers published on pulmonary vascular disease each year since 1990. (c) The regional distribution of researchers. The data were compiled from a PubMed-wide search by Abigail Drennan and Amy Zeifman in the University of Illinois at Chicago. The world's 193 nations protect their borders, and the movement of people between nations is carefully controlled. But diseases ignore borders and nationalities, and “view” the world in their own terms. Idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (IPAH), for example, ignores nationality and focuses on gender, predominantly affecting young women. Happily, knowledge is just like disease in that sense, that it ignores national boundaries, makes a graveyard of ignorance, and improves public health. Global distribution of researchers studying pulmonary vascular disease Perhaps the most basic lesson from the whole history of Medicine is that diseases thrive in a “climate” of ignorance, and are defeated by knowledge. Yellow fever decimated the world until Cuban doctor Carlos Finlay proposed, in 1881, that its vector was the female of the mosquito species Aedes aegypti, which American doctor Walter Reed confirmed in 1900. Likewise, pulmonary vascular disease is flourishing today in some parts of the world (and indeed in some parts of the so-called “developed” world) in part because of the ignorance that still surrounds it. But, again happily, that ignorance is being reduced by what can be called “the Voice of the World of PVD.” This journal, Pulmonary Circulation, was the first-ever peer-reviewed journal dedicated to PVD, and at present it remains the only journal devoted to the field of pulmonary circulation publishing original research articles, review articles, case reports and perspectives in PVD. But we are only part of “the Voice,” which is also being expressed around the world in various ways, notably at the annual meetings of professional associations. For example, just in 2011 so far, there have been PVD conferences in Panama and in Dubai, as well as two in China and two in India, all hosted by the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute, the PVRI, publisher of Pulmonary Circulation-over and above important meetings that have been held throughout North America and Europe.[3] Meanwhile, educational efforts for the general public are also a critical part of the Voice of PVD, notably those being undertaken by the Pulmonary Hypertension Association, whose former board member, Gail Boyer Hayes, recently wrote, “If a village is required to raise a child, surely the whole world is needed to cure PH.”[4] Pulmonary Circulation is therefore not merely a repository of research findings. In sharing important knowledge among the world's physicians, physician scientists, investigators, and even patients–both in print and online–this journal is slowly but surely helping to reduce the ignorance that PVD needs in order to keep killing people. As its editors, we keep “the big picture” firmly in mind. The goal is not merely to produce a medical periodical. The goal is to empower our profession by facilitating the information exchange that will lead to new therapies, new strategies, and ultimately even cures. Our goal is not merely a world-class publication, but nothing less than a world without PVD. When vascular and cardiopulmonary diseases no longer exist, this journal will have achieved its purpose. Until that day, we welcome the addition of your voice to ours, through your submission of manuscripts describing your best work, which will then help the work of others throughout the lopsided World of PVD.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,060
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,419

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle