MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2023428584 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0313

The Man Who Discovered Flight: George Cayley and the First Airplane (review)

2009· article· en· W2023428584 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Tanya Gogan

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueHistory and Developments in Astronomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeorge (robot)BiographyAmateurArt historySociologyClassicsHistoryLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Man Who Discovered Flight: George Cayley and the First Airplane Tanya Gogan (bio) Richard Dee. The Man Who Discovered Flight: George Cayley and the First Airplane. McClelland and Stewart. xii, 328. $32.99 For English aristocrat Sir George Cayley (1773–1857), ‘A day passed without acquiring a new idea, was a day wasted.’ According to biographer Richard Dee, Cayley not only voiced these words, he lived them. Cayley spent most of his life seeking knowledge, promoting education, and encouraging the practical application of science. In particular, he keenly desired to solve the riddle of heavier-than-air flight. Dee’s fascinating biography offers new insights into Cayley’s achievements and will appeal to readers interested in all aspects of the history of science, since Cayley exemplified the unfailing optimism and varied interests held by amateur scientists during these years. Dee combined his family’s interest in aviation, a background in science, and historical research to recapture the importance of Cayley’s work. Living in York, England, as a child, not far from Cayley’s home, Dee acquired a love for aviation from his father, who served in the Royal Air Force. Now residing in Toronto, Dee works as a post-doctoral fellow at York University, where he uses research in neuroscience to help future astronauts cope with extended space flight. While still focusing on the future, Dee [End Page 258] began studying aviation’s past. After examining Cayley’s notebooks, publications, and family correspondence, Dee argues that Cayley discovered the secret of ‘aerial navigation’ and even launched the first airplane long before the American Wright Brothers’ groundbreaking flight. Cayley’s numerous sketches, calculations, aerodynamic tests, and glider flights, all proved that heavier-than-air flight was possible. Sadly, Cayley also realized that engineering was not sufficiently advanced to make powered flight a reality. Nevertheless, Cayley’s work would influence future generations when they began their own experiments many years later. Using chronological chapters to narrate Cayley’s personal and public life, Dee passes quickly over Cayley’s childhood to focus on his years as a baronet from age eighteen until his death at age eighty-four. By the time Cayley reached adulthood he had acquired an unconventional education due to its inclusion of theoretical and practical science. He then married Sarah Walker, the daughter of his first tutor, with whom he fathered ten children. Unfortunately, Cayley’s only surviving son, Digby, did not share his father’s interest in science and felt ashamed by his father’s work in aviation, a subject that many people regarded as mere fantasy. Although a brief political career temporarily prevented Cayley from publishing papers on heavier-than-air flight, public skepticism and family embarrassment failed to dissuade Cayley from following his passion. Cayley not only engaged in scientific inquiry, he promoted science-based education and its practical use by helping to establish local philosophical societies as well as London’s Polytechnic Institute, where he served as director of the governing board until his death. Throughout his long life Cayley helped forward a variety of scientific disciplines, but aviation truly captured his imagination. Cayley’s efforts resulted in a list of accomplishments far too long to enumerate. A brief selection includes the following firsts: documentation of aerodynamic forces in 1793, flight testing of a winged flyer in 1804, and flight of a manned glider in 1849. Although these and other accomplishments ensured Cayley’s recognition as an expert during his lifetime, his work was soon forgotten after his death and his flyers hidden from view by his son. Fortunately, Cayley’s publications were rediscovered in the late nineteenth century and helped lead to what he knew was possible with advanced engine technology, the world’s first powered and controlled heavier-than-air flight in 1903. While some criticisms can be made concerning the lack of citations and an introduction devoted to historiography, these omissions are understandable, given Dee’s work as an amateur historian and his desire to create a study acceptable to a wider audience. In fact, Dee’s explanation of science in lay terms ensures that this book will appeal to a wide readership. Aviation buffs will enjoy Cayley’s...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,837
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,407

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,173
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetHistory and Developments in AstronomyTravaux en français237 207