MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2023640573 · doi:10.2523/iptc-11115-ms

Reservoir Optimization and Monitoring: Mauddud Reservoir - Bahrain Field

2007· article· en· W2023640573 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAll Days · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensConocoPhillips (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWorkoverWorkflowInfillPetroleum engineeringReservoir engineeringReservoir modelingNatural gas fieldEnvironmental geologyField (mathematics)Production (economics)Process (computing)Computer scienceGeologyEngineeringCivil engineeringPetroleumHydrogeologyNatural gasGeotechnical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract For a matured oil field like Bahrain Field with a long production history, it is required to identify underperforming areas, infill wells and upgrade the reserves. This paper describes the application of a practical process (1) to develop systematic workflow for production optimization and reservoir analysis; (2) Identify and highlight reservoir trends, patterns and anomalies; (3) Identify and highlight the under performing wells/areas and recommend solutions, and (4) Identify essential patterns for consideration in overall development plan. It is required to quickly adopt assessment methods for such a mature field. The area used for the study consists of 431 wells in Mauddud reservoir which is one of the major producing zones. The challenge was to evaluate large data sets in a short time and cost-effective manner. The technique uses a streamlined workflow of reservoir assessment processes, which require a sequence of data gathering, formatting and validation through combining the data with several processes associated with both the static and the dynamic model of the reservoir. Quick interpretations of these models generate opportunity regions, re-completions and workover candidates, and new infill potential in the reservoir. Based on the processes run in the Mauddud zones it was possible to understand rapidly the reservoir performance and main issues associated with field development (water production, gas injection, potential transfer areas). In addition, underperforming wells/areas and potentially undrained areas (high remaining reserves zones with low water cut and low Gas Oil Ratio) were identified with certainty in a timely manner. As a result of these techniques, the development drilling program was suitably adopted to realize an efficient reservoir management process for developing the field and helped in decreasing decline rate and increasing the recovery. Introduction: The Bahrain field, the first discovery in Arabian Gulf region, has been on production since 1933. It is an asymmetrical anticline trending in the North-South direction. The field is a multi-stack carbonate and sandstone reservoirs with 16 oil and 6 gas reservoirs. Most of them are carbonate reservoirs. The nature of the fluids varies from tarry oil in Aruma zone to dry gas in the Khuff zones (Figure-1). The geology of the field is extremely complex with a large number of faults especially in the Wasia group formations, which contain the major oil reservoir of the Bahrain field, Mauddud (Figure-2). The Bahrain zones, of the Lower Cretaceous age, are the most important oil-producing group found in this field. The most important zone within this group, and the subject of this paper, is Mauddud. The reservoir rock consists of white to light gray, fine- to medium-grained, clean bioclastic limestone. Bioclastic packstones and wackestones dominate. The degree of lithification varies, ranging from moderately soft to hard. Gross thickness varies slightly from 102 to 116 f, all of which is considered net pay. Average porosity and permeability are 31% and 65 md respectively. The middle 50 ft has the highest porosity and permeability. The basel 30 to 40 ft is slightly different in character and appears to have a lower specific productivity index. Average initial water saturation was 6% in the upper section (Ba) and 11% in the basal section (Bb). The reservoir oil was highly undersaturated, Pb @ 450 psig as compared to original reservoir pressure of 1236 psig at 1900 ft subsea. The oil has a solution gas/oil ratio (GOR) of 128 scf/bbl and a density of 0.8556 g/cm3. This major oil zone which is an oil wet system, has been on gas injection since 1938. Over the years of injection a secondary gas cap has developed. The dominant recovery mechanism is gravity drainage with crestal injection of gas from the Khuff zones. The reservoir being heterogeneous and complex structure with a large number of faults, most of the injected gas gets produced. Also significant fluid transfers take place to the zones above and below. As this complex situation can be understood well only by simulation, a simulation model was constructed by utilizing an updated geological model after a recent 3 D seismic survey of the field.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,360
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,701

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle