Tectonics of sedimentary basins, recent advances by Cathy Busby and Antonio Azor Perez. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2012. No. of pages: 664. Price US$149.99. ISBN 978-1-4051-9465-5 (hardback).
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I had a sketchy memory of the old Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins, edited by Cathy Busby and Raymond Ingersoll, and published by Blackwell in 1995, since neither myself nor our library had a copy. No matter, the preface to the new Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins, Recent Advances provides directions for online access to the original (well done to the publisher for making it freely available) and recommends that book for undergraduates, with the new book considered more appropriate for advanced researchers. To an extent, this is good advice. The revision is more expansive in contributions and number of speciality topics. Thirteen chapters in the original have now become 31. Neatly arranged into five ‘parts’, topics range from U–Pb geochronology, cosmogenic nuclides, magnetostratigraphy and 3D-seismic interpretation (Part 2), to rift basins, intracontinental transtensional basins, and passive margins (Part 3), forearc basins, transtensional continental arcs and foreland basins (Part 4), and interior poly-phase basins and cratonic basins (Part 5), with examples including the Laramides and SW USA, East Africa, Atlantic margins, Western Canada, Andes and Tibet … and that is not even an exhaustive list! These four parts are preceded by an excellent introduction to the tectonics of sedimentary basins in a chapter by Ingersoll. However, a revised (and useful) nomenclature is presented in this introduction, but this renders obsolete some of the terminology that is in the precursor text. In this instance, the advice directing undergraduates to the old text is less useful; the students would end up confused, learning out-of-date terms and material. There are some weaknesses. There is always going to be a limit as to how many subjects can be covered in detail (the book is already a hefty tome) and editors are not always successful in getting contributions from leading experts in every relevant subject area. But I would have liked to have seen more of the selected case studies illustrating changing sedimentation with evolution of the tectonic regime and more relating to sedimentation in settings where the tectonic interpretation or influence is more contentious. The impression this reader got was that everything fits too neatly into particular classifications. Readers looking for significant information on salt tectonics will again be disappointed. Certainly such subject matter does not easily fit into a single plate-tectonic classification so, with better coverage, it would probably need its own ‘part’. However, I think a ‘part’ on salt rather than a ‘part’ on techniques and modelling would have produced a more focused product. And I have one major complaint. The book has many large, often colourful, clear and well-proportioned diagrams, yet photographs of stunning outcrop are often reduced to small quarter page, or less, scale. Good observations lead to better interpretations and models. So let us see the rocks! Nevertheless, it is a worthwhile addition to any sedimentologist's library.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle