Food Supply Veterinary Medicine: Creating an Awareness of Livestock Security Risks
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There is growing recognition of a need to redefine traditional food animal veterinary medicine, not only from the standpoint of the skills, knowledge, and abilities required of veterinarians but also from the standpoint of the organizational structures, delivery teams, new breadth of roles, and geographic scope. In the 1970s and 1980s, when we began to practice production medicine, the delivery team included decision makers for the production unit: veterinarians, producers, lenders, nutritionists, animal breeders, and agricultural engineers. Strategies and approaches were geared toward health, welfare, and enterprise productivity. Today, the delivery team includes a broader set of decision makers: appointed and elected government officials, regulatory and law enforcement officials, homeland security advisors, emergency managers, public health practitioners, and CEOs of the biological and pharmaceutical industry. Strategies and approaches are geared toward assuring the health and welfare of animals in multiple livestock industries, protecting the food supply, retaining international markets, and maintaining consumer confidence. This issue of the Journal of Veterinary Medical Education addresses the theme of a changing food animal practitioner, with the area now more appropriately termed “food supply veterinary medicine” in recognition of the expanded role of the veterinary practitioner.1 Several articles in this issue address the need for new directions in health care delivery by species, by livestock industry, and by the full scope of responsibilities for both animal and human health. Others address the need to restructure food animal medicine clinical experiences. This article takes a somewhat different approach, addressing needs and a potential response from a geographic viewpoint. Academic institutions, academic veterinarians, and veterinary students are a critically underutilized resource in meeting global needs for livestock security. While governments ponder complex decisions under a blizzard of conflicting information, non-governmental organizations may find themselves with adequate funding but limited human resources and limited expertise, and people in need go on wanting. Our academic resources need to become formally involved. An effective mechanism to inform educators about the future needs of the profession, adjust academic curricula, and develop a strategy to better utilize our significant academic resources must be identified immediately. “Food animal medicine” has now appropriately expanded into “food supply veterinary medicine.” The issues considered include livestock health and production, product wholesomeness, and distribution and availability of products to meet the needs of global consumers. These issues suggest the need for a comprehensive approach encompassing a vast industry. As veterinarians, we find ourselves employed across all sectors, and we should be a valuable guiding and connecting resource in this food chain. Additional areas of growing importance are bio-security and policy surrounding transboundary, emerging, and bioterrorism-related disease (TEB diseases). Many of the concepts we apply to all three are very similar. The following sections of this article reflect critical considerations toward a hemispheric approach to protection of livestock resources and foods of animal origin. We begin by thinking locally, then nationally, then regionally, and discuss a broad network solution. There is a critical need to consider the role of veterinary education in preparing food supply veterinarians for the future. Dr. Corrie Brown initiates our thinking by focusing on what is needed for early diagnosis and rapid response to a TEB disease; very significant veterinary roles exist at the local level. Dr. Pamela Ibarra reflects on her experiences in Mexico in describing the nature of national responses to protect livestock resources. Dr. Luis Espinoza describes the leadership and projects that are part of the programs of the Organismo Internacional Regional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (OIRSA), a regional animal health organization in Central America. Dr. Everardo Gonzalez Padilla summarizes the perceived needs and discusses a possible network solution. Glenn Slack then issues a challenge to academic veterinary medicine to ensure that the attributes of graduating veterinarians match the needs of society. In an environment of global travel and trade, asymmetric warfare targeting agricultural resources, and rapidly increasing worldwide human populations, hunger, and poverty, the veterinary profession must respond. The profession will look for leaders, and institutions of veterinary education must be among them. THE IMPACT OF EARLY DIAGNOSIS (CORRIE BROWN) A rapid response is required to avoid economic devastation resulting from TEB diseases of animals. However, response mechanisms cannot be activated until the presence of disease is detected. Therefore, early diagnosis is critical. This early diagnosis requires three factors: recognition that there is a disease in the field, sufficient laboratory capacity, and a government with the will to be involved.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».