Listening to SARS: Lessons for Infection Control

Editorials7 October 2003Listening to SARS: Lessons for Infection ControlFREERichard P. Wenzel, MD, MSc and Michael B. Edmond, MD, MPH, MPARichard P. Wenzel, MD, MScFrom Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA 23298. and Michael B. Edmond, MD, MPH, MPAFrom Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA 23298.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00012 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Throughout recorded history, epidemics have relentlessly descended on societies, disturbing their previous harmony. Yet the arrival of these epidemics is usually greeted with disbelief as a shocking and unanticipated event. So it is with the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which has infected at least 8500 people in 30 countries and claimed the lives of 765 (9%). In its wake, the health care and national economic systems of some countries have been seriously disrupted. As hospitals respond, we suggest that they seize the opportunity to manage this outbreak in a way that prepares the medical community broadly for future epidemics.Much has been learned about SARS since its recognition in southern China in February 2003. The etiologic agent has been identified as a novel coronavirus, new diagnostic tests have been developed, and the viral genome has been sequenced (1). Recently, an almost identical virus, although with 29 extra nucleotides, was isolated from palm civet cats bought in a food market in the city of Shenzhen (2). The civets are nocturnal members of the mongoose family, distantly related to feline cats, and considered a culinary delicacy in southern China. Unconfirmed reports suggest that the virus has also been isolated from several other exotic animals (3). Chinese food handlers, caterers, and chefs were overrepresented fivefold among the virus's first victims, another clue suggesting that SARS is a zoonosis. Having crossed species from animals to people, SARS then spread from person to person.The clinical course of SARS is challenging: Twenty percent of infected persons must be cared for in intensive care units, and the presence of diabetes or other comorbid conditions has been independently associated with a need for mechanical ventilation and with death (4). The incubation period is 2 to 10 days, and close contact is important, suggesting that large-droplet spread is the most common mode of transmission. This is further supported by the linear rather than exponential growth of the epidemic over time (5). Remarkably, approximately half of all victims in most countries are health care workers (4), and health care workers who use protective masks improperly while managing patients with SARS are more likely to become infected than those who use the masks properly (6). Occasionally, some patients are described as superspreaders, suggesting that droplet-nuclei (airborne) spread may have occurred.The novel coronavirus can be found in the sputum, tears, blood, urine, and feces. It is shed in feces for 30 days and can survive on hard surfaces for 1 or more days. This raises the specter of possible transmission by fomites in the hospital. Thus, hospital epidemiologists need to consider multiple pathways for infection: most commonly through large droplets and secretions, but otherwise possibly through blood transfusions or sharps injuries, droplet nuclei, or fomites. This portfolio of possible mechanisms surely indicates that assiduous infection control is essential for containment.In this issue, Ho and colleagues (7) describe the transmission of SARS to 41 health care workers in a community hospital in Hong Kong. Because the index cases were unrecognized in patients hospitalized on a general medical ward, health care workers did not institute protective measures. The subsequent establishment of an isolation ward and the very strict use of infection-control measures are credited with containing the virus's spread.All cases of SARS should be managed in airborne isolation with negative air pressure rooms. Health care workers should use gowns, gloves, face shields, and N95 masks. Special care should be practiced in managing body fluids and avoiding sharps injuries. Meticulous handwashing is essential between all patient contacts and even after removing gloves. Bedside tables and all equipment that could be touched by health care workers should be disinfected twice daily. Patients with SARS should not be permitted to donate blood for at least 6 weeks after illness.All institutions should pause briefly to reexamine their capacity to manage an outbreak of contagious respiratory infections. In the era of bioterror, SARS, the annual epidemics of influenza, and the nascent appearance of monkeypox in the United States, the number of negative air pressure rooms in hospitals is important. We recommend that large hospitals develop plans for geographic clustering of approximately 10 negative air pressure rooms that could be used in an urgent situation. The rationale is that a small group of health care workers with enhanced skills in infection control could be trained to manage patients with contagious respiratory diseases. Currently, isolation rooms in most U.S. hospitals are scattered, and patients with SARS could expose many teams of health care workers on various floors to the virus.Patient-to-patient spread of SARS from an initially unrecognized case remains a huge challenge. Rapid diagnostic tests with early isolation of confirmed case-patients will be extremely helpful. However, the best that physicians can do in the meantime is to use their clinical acumen to suspect and isolate possible case-patients until the diagnosis is confirmed. In the face of an uncontrolled epidemic, patients in the emergency department or clinic who have fever and respiratory symptoms should be offered a standard surgical mask and evaluated in a negative air pressure room by expert clinicians.We would markedly limit not only the number of health care workers exposed but also the number of visitors to patients with SARS. Of importance, if health care workers are inadvertently exposed to a case-patient, we recommend that they be immediately furloughed and remain at home for 10 days before being permitted to return to manage patients. This is a costly measure but may be essential in controlling transmission.The novel coronavirus is one of the latest in a series of continually emerging pathogens to challenge our global society. It has distinguished itself by a remarkable ability to amplify its communicability within the hospital setting, becoming an almost perfect nosocomial pathogen. The critical lessons learned from managing the current SARS epidemic should be institutionalized as rational preparations for the next one.Richard P. Wenzel, MD, MScMichael B. Edmond, MD, MPH, MPAVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmond, VA 23298References1. Holmes KV. SARS coronavirus: a new challenge for prevention and therapy. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1605-9. [PMID: 12782660] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Enserink M. Infectious diseases. Clues to the animal origins of SARS. Science. 2003;300:1351. [PMID: 12775803] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Altman L. SARS enigma: cases decline, but doubts remain. New York Times.; 8 6 2003:A-10. Google Scholar4. Booth CM, Matukas LM, Tomlinson GA, Rachlis AR, Rose DB, Dwosh HA, . Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 144 patients with SARS in the greater Toronto area. JAMA. 2003;289:2801-9. [PMID: 12734147] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Vogel G. SARS outbreak. Modelers struggle to grasp epidemic's potential scope. Science. 2003;300:558-9. [PMID: 12714711] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Seto WH, Tsang D, Yung RW, Ching TY, Ng TK, Ho M, . Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Lancet. 2003;361:1519-20. [PMID: 12737864] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Ho AS, Sung JY, Chan-Yeung M. 2003 An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome among hospital workers in a community hospital in Hong Kong. Ann Intern Med. 139:564-7. LinkGoogle Scholar Comments0 CommentsSign In to Submit A Comment Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Richard P. Wenzel, MD, MSc; Michael B. Edmond, MD, MPH, MPAAffiliations: From Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA 23298.Disclosures: None disclosed.Corresponding Author: Richard P. Wenzel, MD, MSc, Virginia Commonwealth University, Old City Hall, Suite 405, 1001 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23298.Current Author Addresses: Drs. Wenzel and Edmond: Virginia Commonwealth University, Old City Hall, Suite 405, 1001 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23298. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoAn Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome among Hospital Workers in a Community Hospital in Hong Kong Alice S. Ho , Joseph J.Y. Sung , and Moira Chan-Yeung Metrics Cited byThe effect of various boron compounds on the antimicrobial activity of hardened mortarsThe deadly coronaviruses: The 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in ChinaPublic health services in Shenzhen: a case studyHealthcare-Associated InfectionsThe SARS epidemic in mainland China: bringing together all epidemiological dataNursing students' knowledge and practice of infection control precautions: an educational interventionInfection control in the management of highly pathogenic infectious diseases: consensus of the European Network of Infectious DiseaseStaff perception and institutional reporting: two views of infection control compliance in British Columbia and Ontario three years after an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndromeEthics and Public Health Emergencies: Encouraging ResponsibilityEthics and Public Health Emergencies: Restrictions on LibertySARS: How to Manage Future Outbreaks?SARS-CoV Attack (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome)Lessons from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS): Implications for Infection ControlBiosafety Level 3 Laboratory for Autopsies of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Principles, Practices, and ProspectsThe Current Infectious Risks of TransfusionsAmerican College of Chest Physicians and American Association for Bronchology Consensus StatementEmergency Department Response to SARS, TaiwanThe Current Infectious Risks of TransfusionsThe Current Infectious Risks of TransfusionsSimilar environmental survival patterns of Streptococcus pyogenes strains of different epidemiologic backgrounds and clinical severityRecommendations for the prevention of transmission of SARS during GI endoscopyChapter 2: Quarantine and Civil Liberties 7 October 2003Volume 139, Issue 7Page: 592-593KeywordsBloodFoodHealth care providersHealth economicsPathogensSARS coronavirusSputumUpper respiratory tract infectionsUrineVentilators ePublished: 7 October 2003 Issue Published: 7 October 2003 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2003 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.