Sequential therapy with intravitreal bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy for idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 48-year-old Indian male presented with sudden decrease in visual acuity and metamorphosia of 1 week duration in the left eye. At the initial visit the visual acuity was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/60 in the left eye. Fundoscopic examination revealed hypopigmented juxtafoveal lesions in the right eye. The left eye revealed reddish-orange subretinal lesions with exudative changes, serous pigmented epithelial detachment (PED) and neurosensory detachment involving the posterior pole. Fluorescein angiography demonstrated juxtafoveal choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) and leaking polyps. The right eye also revealed juxtafoveal polyps. Inodocyanine green angiography confirmed the findings (Fig. 1). The patient was given a 1.25 mg intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin®; Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA) under all aseptic precautions after written consent was obtained. The study has been registered with clinicaltrials.gov/NCT00403026. Four weeks after the injection there was resolution of PEDs and serous neurosensory elevation with improvement of vision to 6/24 and reduction of metamorphosia. The consecutive scanning laser ophthalmoscope-optical coherence tomography (SLO-OCT; Ophthalmic Technologies Inc., Toronto, Canada) cross-sectional images showed decrease in neurosensory detachment, decreased distortion of retinal structure with resolution of cystic changes in the retina. Longitudinal (B-Scan) OCT mode was selected to produce cross-sectional images. Internal fixation target was placed on the clear SLO image to scan the area of interest centred in the SLO screen because this patient had poor fixation. After 1 month, he underwent photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin according to standard protocol. The juxtafoveal CNVM was treated and vision further improved from 6/24 to 6/12 by 2 weeks after therapy and remained the same until the end of 4 months of treatment. Colour fundus photographs, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiograms and scanning laser ophthalmoscope-optical coherence tomography (SLO-OCT), oblique cross-sectional scan images of the left eye of a 48-year-old Indian male who underwent sequential therapy of intravitreal bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with choroidal neovascular membrane. (A) SLO-OCT scan showing a hyper-reflective layer of retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED) with overlying neurosensory layer elevation. Overlying retinal structure is distorted with cystic changes in the retina. (B) SLO-OCT scan image after 1 week of intravitreal bevacizumab showing hyper-reflective layer of PED with overlying minimal neurosensory detachment and nodular hyper-reflective elevations corresponding to the polypoidal lesions. (C) SLO-OCT scan image after 1 month of injection of bevacizumab showing almost complete resolution of exudation with juxtafoveal hyper-reflective signals and heaping of retinal structure; note that the foveal contour is seen. (D) Fundus photograph showing multiple reddish-orange subretinal nodules and exudative changes involving the posterior pole. (E) Fluorescein angiography showing leaking polyps with juxtafoveal choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) and localized area of hyperfluorescence nasal to fovea (PED). (F) Indocyanine green angiogram early frames demonstrating the branching vascular network terminating into polypoidal dilatation with juxtafoveal hot spot. (G) Fundus photograph after 1 month of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin showing resolution of exudation and juxtafoveal scarring. (H) The corresponding late fluorescein angiogram frames showing minimal juxtafoveal leak, suggestive of fibrosis. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) often follows a remitting–relapsing course associated with multiple, recurrent serosanguinous macular detachment. When the choroidal abnormal vasculature with exudative changes extends to the subfovea, visual prognosis is expected to be poor. PDT is the only recommended treatment for lesions involving the fovea secondary to subfoveal PCV. It achieved stable or improved vision in 95% of the eyes with PCV in a prospective study by Chan et al. (2004). Herein, we report a case of PCV with CNVM and exudative changes involving the fovea. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) have been implicated as one of the causative factors for increased vascular leakage and new vessel formation. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab therapy improved visual acuity and morphological changes in the majority cases in all subgroups of CNVM secondary to various aetiologies (Pederson et al. 2007). In a case report (Soliman et al. 2006), intravitreal bevacizumab for peripapillary subretinal neovascularization caused rapid resolution of subretinal fluid and haemorrhage with improvement in visual acuity. In this case it was not possible to perform primary PDT or laser treatment because of the wide area of neursensory detachment and PEDs with retinal oedema overlying the polypoidal lesions. Moreover, PDT is avoided in the presence of PEDs for the risk of retinal pigment epithelial tears (Axer-Siegel et al. 2004). Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in improvement of both visual and anatomical signs in occult CNVM with PED (Aggio et al. 2006). In this case, intravitreal bevacizumab therapy probably resulted in rapid reduction of exudation, which is unlikely to be a natural remission of the disease. Also, rapid resolution of subretinal fluid and PED probably prevents advanced cellular damage to retinal pigment epithelial and photoreceptors. The combination of PDT and antiangiogenic therapy adjunct may reduce frequency of retreatments; bevacizumab therapy inhibits CNV-induced leakage and lesion growth and PDT induces thrombosis and atrophy of neovascular membrane. Therefore, sequential therapy could be an effective mode of management of such conditions involving the posterior pole in this short-term observation. However, randomized controlled trials in larger samples are warranted to elucidate the efficacy of sequential therapy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».