Cardiac toxicity and adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer – the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario experience.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract #3158 Background: In May 2005 several large randomized trials reported a significant improvement in DFS following the addition of trastuzumab (T) to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in early stage breast cancer (BC) such that in the summer of 2005 adjuvant T became standard of care for patients (pts) whose tumors over-expressed her2. Cardiotoxicity had been reported as the main toxicity suffered by pts exposed to T. As the generalizability of clinical trial results to the 'real world' is under increasing scrutiny from the oncology community, we undertook this study to identify and follow the population of interest and to characterize cardiac toxicity related to adjuvant T as practice changed. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic and paper records of all pts prescribed adjuvant T for early stage BC at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario from June 2005 through January 2007; collecting demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related variables, along with serial left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements for each pt. Results: 54 pts prescribed adjuvant T were identified in this time period, nearly half of which were still on T at the time of this analysis. Mean age was 54.4 ± 9.5 years, 38.9% had N0 disease, and 40.7% had left sided tumors, with 42.6% being ER+ and 50% being PR+. Most pts received anthracycline based CT (53.7%) and 39% received an anthracycline/taxane combination. T was concurrently with CT in 14.8% of pts, concurrently with radiotherapy in 33.3% and sequentially in the remainder. T was initiated at a mean of 91.2 days from completion of chemotherapy (range 19-365). Our local protocol mandated LVEF assessments at baseline pre CT, upon completion of CT and/or prior to initiation of T for all pts, and while on T all pts underwent LVEF assessments at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 52 weeks, and in response to any symptoms suggesting cardiac dysfunction. Mean LVEF pre CT and post CT was 64% and 62% respectively. We saw no change in LVEF post CT and pre T. We noted a significant decline in LVEF after 12 weeks on T, from 60.5 ± 6.2% to 56.5 ± 9.5% respectively (p = 0.003), with LVEF values remaining stable thereafter. However, at the time of this analysis only approximately half the pts had completed the full year of therapy. Twelve pts (22.2%) interrupted their T therapy due to a drop in LVEF of >10%, only one pt experienced symptomatic cardiotoxicity requiring treatment. Of these twelve, only two pts restarted T at a later date. Follow-up of those patients still on trastuzumab is ongoing. Discussion: Adjuvant trastuzumab in general clinical practice is associated with significant decreases in LVEF that are associated with premature discontinuation of therapy. A better understanding of factors associated with LVEF decline and the trends in LVEF over time may allow for targeted interventions for pts at risk. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 3158.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».