MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2025121477 · doi:10.1177/002070201206700111

Still the Fire-Proof House?

2012· article· en· W2025121477 sur OpenAlex
Victor Platt

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCyberspaceEspionageTerrorismGovernment (linguistics)Industrial espionagePolitical scienceLawCyberwarfareLaw enforcementComputer securityPublic relationsLaw and economicsSociologyThe InternetComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The popular media is dominated by stories of cyber insecurity, from massive dumps of diplomatic cables on Wikileaks to Chinese cyber spy rings or, most recently, the cyber attack on the French government. Indeed, a flood of policies have emerged in recent years to deal with the problem, among them Canada's cyber security strategy. Canada has been traditionally described as a fire-proof house based on its advantageous geographic situation, however the globalized nature of Cyberspace is eroding this conventional wisdom. The purpose of this article is to critically assess the literature on cyber terrorism and cyber espionage, the threats they pose at both state and international levels, and possible responses to them. The article provides evaluative criteria with which to analyze Canada's cyber security strategy and to inform policy recommendations moving forward. I contend that although the security strategy outlines concrete steps for prevention, real-time response, and law enforcement on a domestic level, it fails to recognize the importance of the international diplomatic and policy cooperation required to deal with the hyper-globalized, highly international suite of threats in cyberspace.The article is divided into four sections: the first section provides terms of reference and conducts a detailed review of the scholarly and government literature on cyber terrorism and espionage. The second reviews the literature with respect to the response to these cyber threats, situates them in the global system, and examines how the international diplomatic community is coping. The third section applies the evaluative criteria that emerge from the literature to Canada's cyber security strategy, and the fourth provides policy recommendations.TERMS OF REFERENCE AND LITERATURE REVIEWFor the purposes of this article, cyber terrorism is defined as computer-tocomputer attacks intended to cause significant damage in order to coerce or intimidate a government or civilian population.1 Cyber espionage is defined as the use of Cyberspace by governments to illicitly procure classified information.The security landscape in the digital age is vastly different from traditional Cold War conceptions of it. Globalization has ushered in new and uncharted realm for observers of security studies and policy makers alike. Ironically, the technologies that form the basic fabric of the Internet [also create]... the 'soft underbelly of vulnerabilities that enables cyber crime and espionage to advance to unprecedented levels.2 In this new arena, hardware and software determine the landscape of the battlefield, not mountains, valleys, or waterways.3 Cyber terrorism and cyber espionage are fuelled by the interconnectedness and interdependency of Cyberspace and the globalized world at large and consequently display considerable complexity in the methods by which they operate and the vulnerabilities they expose.CYBER TERRORISMCyber terrorism has received much scholarly attention over the past decade. Even before 9/11 there had been great angst about the possibilities of cyber terrorism.4 This comes as no surprise; the combination of the two scary concepts conjures powerful imagery. In the post-g/n world counterterrorism has continued to dominate the literature. Cyber terrorists use Cyberspace in two distinct yet complementary ways: first, to facilitate and maximize organizational and operational efficiency, and second, to provide the offensive capacity to carry out cyber-attacks. Most significantly, Cyberspace allows terrorist organizations to disseminate propaganda and recruitment information with little operational exposure. Moreover, scholars cite intelligence, communication, training, and fundraising as key ways that terrorists use Cyberspace.Cyberspace has also provided terrorists with new, highly effective, offensive capabilities. The most common form of these capabilities is called distributed denial of service, where attackers overwhelm websites and servers by bombarding them with data, or 'traffic' through a number of surrogate, or zombie, computers that they have infected with malicious code. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,469
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,662

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,327
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle