MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2025262787 · doi:10.1353/clw.2006.0003

A New Course in Ancient Engineering

2005· article· en· W2025262787 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Bertman

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Classical World · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMechanics and Biomechanics Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIngenuityHumanityCivilizationSubject (documents)ClassicsHistorySociologyLibrary scienceArchaeologyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A New Course in Ancient Engineering Stephen Bertman Supported by a grant from the Kern Family Foundation, Lawrence Technological University in Southfield, Michigan, in 2004 introduced a new course designed by a classicist but aimed at students preparing to become professional engineers. Entitled "Ancient Engineering," its purpose was two-fold: to give students a sense of historical perspective by showing them how engineers have contributed to the development of society since humanity's earliest days and to inspire them to address boldly the challenges of the twenty-first century by presenting them with classic examples of practical initiative, ingenuity, and determination drawn from some of civilization's most glorious epochs. The university's hope was that by appreciating the challenges faced by their predecessors and the impressive successes they had achieved, students would go on to become better engineers. Furthermore, because the visionary engineers of antiquity were famous for "thinking big," Lawrence Tech students would, it was hoped, become daring modern entrepreneurs in keeping with that ancient legacy. The development and implementation of this course by myself, a classicist, was an innovation in its own right. Of the almost 10,000 classroom and distance-learning courses in the American Society for Engineering Education's database, there was at the time not a single course listed on the subject of ancient engineering. Worldwide, only seven universities offered courses that focused on ancient technology: the University of Bristol in England; the University of Victoria in Canada; and, in the United States, Bucknell University, the University of Missouri, the University of New Mexico, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Texas Tech University. Additionally, the University of Wales Swansea offered a course called "History of Ancient Technology and Engineering." But the creation of a course devoted exclusively to ancient engineering would be a "first." On one level the course was designed as a survey of civilization from prehistory to the latter days of the Roman Empire. The first half of the course examined the work of Stone Age, Mesopotamian, and Egyptian engineers; the second half of the course examined the engineering achievements of ancient Greece and Rome. Students studied the formative principles of each major culture. These included the prehistoric struggle to survive; the Mesopotamian hunger for prosperity and stability; the Egyptian quest for immortality; the intellectualism of the Greeks and their passion for perfection; and the pragmatism of the Romans and their commitment to urban life. My students then learned how those values and beliefs, combined with available material and human resources, defined the projects ancient engineers devoted their talents and energies to. In the process, the class also observed the positive social impact of engineering accomplishments. In addition to becoming acquainted with practical innovations like irrigation systems, paved roads, bridges, and aqueducts, students also learned about the marvelous mechanical inventions of the Hellenistic period and the many monumental wonders of the ancient world, including the Great Pyramid, the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, the Parthenon, the Colosseum, the Pantheon, Hadrian's Wall, and the Baths of Caracalla. The main textbook for the course was L. Sprague de Camp's delightful The Ancient Engineers (New York 1993, first pub. 1960), supplemented by J. G. Landels' Engineering in the Ancient World, rev. ed. (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2000). Lectures were illustrated with color slides and videos drawn from the Discovery Channel (www.discovery.com), the Learning Channel [End Page 70] (www.tlc.discovery.com), the History Channel (www.HistoryChannel.com), and Nova (www.publicvideostore.org). At the end of the course, students were invited to present homemade models illustrating ancient engineering principles in action. This proved to be the most illuminating part of the course as student teams grappled with some of the very problems of design that their predecessors had faced to achieve the results they desired. Projects included making an Egyptian-style "shaduf" to lift water effortlessly from a reservoir using a basket, a lever, and a counterweight; constructing a leaking "sandbox" that succeeded in gently lowering a miniature sarcophagus to the floor of its "crypt"; designing an Archimedean screw-pump that, when twisted, raised beans from a storage bin; and building a downsized Roman "onager," or catapult, that accurately...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,102
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,341

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1020,031

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Classical WorldMême sujetMechanics and Biomechanics StudiesTravaux en français237 207