MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2026207415 · doi:10.2523/iptc-16860-ms

Object Characterisation and Simulation of Thermal Recovery from Karstified, Brecciated and Fractured Bitumen Carbonate Reservoirs

2013· article· en· W2026207415 sur OpenAlex
C. C. Ezeuko, Michael S. Kallos, Ian D. Gates

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyPetroleum engineeringCarbonateOil in placePermeability (electromagnetism)Enhanced oil recoveryEnvironmental geologyGemologyFracture (geology)AsphaltPetrologyGeotechnical engineeringHydrogeologyEngineering geologyPetroleumVolcanism

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract A continued increase in energy demand has amplified the significance of commercial heavy oil and bitumen recovery from complex carbonates formations such as the Grosmont Formation (OOIP ~ 406.5 billion barrels) in Alberta, Canada. To facilitate commercial development of bitumen carbonates, we have designed reservoir simulation models of complex carbonate reservoirs based on the concept of multiple interacting objects. Spatial distribution of different objects including fractures, vugs, breccia, and matrix are constructed by using stochastic methods with intensity functions derived from cores, logs, drilling and geologic data. Thermal reservoir simulations are conducted directly on realizations of these 'objects network' reservoir models. Although data from the highly fractured, karstified and vuggy bitumen-rich Grosmont Formation is used in this paper, this methodology is generic and applicable to other complex carbonate reservoirs. Results suggest that continuous type steam-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) such as steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) may not be best suited for bitumen recovery from complex carbonates. Introduction The ultimate aim of reservoir characterization is to construct a representative spatial quantification of storativity (porosity), hydraulic conductivity (permeability), and fluid phase saturations. In highly complex carbonates where fractures, vugs, matrices, and karsts contribute to recovery performances, reservoir models must sufficiently represent the heterogeneity in hydraulic corridors (described here as object clusters) to accurately predict fluid breakthrough and ultimate recovery for different EOR technologies. Unfortunately, the 'forward modeling' approach (which focuses on understanding drivers that generated fractures by analyzing parameters such as stress distribution, fracture height, fracture spacing) often used by geoscientists for characterizing naturally fractured reservoirs (NFR) of sandstone matrix is seldom sufficient for carbonates. This is primarily due to the complex process of diagenesis inherent in carbonates. As a result, a systematic combination of the 'forward modeling' approach to the 'inverse modeling' approach (this approach focuses on understanding the responses created by fractures such as productivity heterogeneity, breakthrough, and channelized flow) is favored for the Grosmont carbonate reservoir. There are seldom sufficient data for complex carbonates, especially because of the difficulty to obtain consolidated sample representative of the tremendous heterogeneity. Although the emergence of tools such as the Formation Microimager (FMI), Computed Tomography (CT) scans, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and the improvements in traditional formation evaluation methods have contributed to increasing data availability, effective integration of data at different scales is extremely important to derive value from these measurements. Although statistics derived from wellbore (typically from vertical wells) measurements provide insight into the vertical distribution of properties such as fracture geometry, fracture length, fracture orientation, vugs, karsts; spatial distribution of these properties can be constrained by the knowledge of larger (km) scale correlations. As an example, previous studies suggest that a good large (km) scale lateral continuity of facies exist for the Grosmont Formation (Edmunds et al., 2009). Geologic studies have also described the predominant location of large karsts (nearer the sub cretaceous unconformity), (Hans et al., 2012). Therefore, in addition to well data, larger scale seismic and geologic data offer increased data control points thereby reducing the uncertainty in the developed model. Analysis of early pilot tests (Ezeuko et al., 2013) indicates a reasonable-to-high injectivity, suggesting a high degree of communication between high conductivity (mostly fractures, vugs, and karst) object clusters.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,738
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,683

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle