Changes in Porosity Due to Acid Gas Injection As Determined by X-Ray Computed Tomography
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract There is an increasing trend to dispose acid gases (H2S and CO2) generated from natural gas processing by geologic sequestration. Industry and government must carefully assess the compatibility of the formation matrix and fluids, with the intended injection stream, to ensure safe and efficient facility operations. We investigated cores subjected to acid gasflooding using X-Ray computed tomography (CT) analysis. The changes in pore morphology, pore size, and pore distribution were examined. Results indicated that the porosity roughly doubled and pore size increased substantially. Visually distinct areas of the core suggested that changes in porosity were non-uniform, probably due to the natural heterogeneity in the rock and/or regions of nonuniform flooding due to lack of pore interconnectivity in the matrix. Detailed CT image analysis revealed traces of halite (NaCl) probably due to the desiccation of the initial water saturation by the highly under-saturated injected gas. Our results suggest that changes in porosity are not attributed to dissolution processes but due to fine dislodgement and desiccation. Consequently, the permeability and porosity increases were the result of physical processes rather than chemical ones. Introduction Acid gas injection into geologic formations is an alternative way to dispose the undesirable waste stream produced from natural gas processing. This technology allows sour gas disposal to be economically viable and also provides a more environmentally friendly option compared to the conventional flaring method. To ensure successful disposal in a safe and efficient manner, adequate disposal information such as the compatibility between the fluid and the reservoir matrix is needed. It is a regulatory requirement to prove the formation and injection fluid compatibility as stated in government disposal guidelines(1) The rock permeability and porosity are the most important properties that control the fluid flow necessary for a successful injection operation, and they are typically assessed through core sensitivity tests(2–4). Alteration of the formation porosity or permeability during acid gas injection occurs mainly through chemical or mechanical mechanisms(3) such as desiccation, dissolution, and fine dislodgement. Usually these mechanisms are assumed to impose detrimental effects on the permeability of the matrix, but in some cases, benefits result from injection operations due to increases in permeability and/or porosity(2) Desiccation Prior to the actual injection, the acid gas stream, once separated from the natural gas stream, undergoes the processes of compression and dehydration. Dehydration removes water in the gas stream to reduce the possibility of hydrate formation. Once the undersaturated acid gas stream enters the formation via the injection well, desiccation of the formation occurs upon contact with the irreducible water present in the pore spaces(2, 3). Reduction in water saturation increases injectivity due to lessening of adverse permeability effects associated with the presence of the initial water in the porous media(2). A concentrative effect occurs if the initial irreducible water is highly saturated with soluble salts or if the initial water is reduced to significantly low levels such that the remaining water is supersaturated with dissolved ions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».