MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2027621025 · doi:10.1353/nin.2011.0008

Baseball's Peerless Semipros: The Brooklyn Bushwicks of Dexter Park (review)

2011· article· en· W2027621025 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jesse Draper

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParadeArt historyNewspaperArtHistoryGeorge (robot)Visual artsMedia studiesSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Baseball's Peerless Semipros: The Brooklyn Bushwicks of Dexter Park Jesse Draper Thomas Barthel . Baseball's Peerless Semipros: The Brooklyn Bushwicks of Dexter Park. Harworth, NJ: St. Johann Press, 2009. 304 pp. Cloth, $29.95. In the last paragraph of his forward to Baseball's Peerless Semipros, Jack Lang, past president of the Baseball Writers Association of America, closes by suggesting that "Tom Barthel, who spent years researching his subject, will take you on a roller coaster ride through that grand and almost forgotten era" (vi). Those words prove to be true, though perhaps not in the manner originally intended by Lang. There is no question that Barthel spent countless hours researching the era of semipro baseball, as this is his second book on that time period in the last three years (Baseball Barnstorming and Exhibition Games, 1901-1962 was published by McFarland in 2007). And yet, despite a wealth of interesting historical anecdotes—drawn almost exclusively from newspaper box scores and articles—Jack Lang's aforementioned roller coaster ride comes not so much from the thrills and stars of baseball's "golden" era, but rather from marginal writing, poor documentation, and little evidence that the text was edited before publication. Baseball's Peerless Semipros tells the story of Max Rosner's Brooklyn Bushwicks, the strongest (and most profitable) semipro team in the first half of the twentieth century. Barthel chronologically orders the team's history into eight chapters covering varying time periods between 1918 and 1951, ending with a brief epilogue which covers the death of Rosner and the impact he had on the game. The first chapter, "The Beginning," offers a somewhat scattered, but detailed, history of the origins of baseball in Brooklyn. Barthel chronicles Max Rosner's assent from a young Jewish immigrant making cigars out of [End Page 168] his garage, to his fortuitous partnership with Manhattan booking agent and Inter-City Association organizer Nat Strong, who controlled when and where semipro teams played. Rosner first got into semipro baseball "to boost his cigar business by sponsoring a team," the Paramounts, who "played in Paramount park in Williamsburg as well as other venues" (6). Semipro clubs were most often named for the neighborhood they played in, and when Rosner formed the Bushwicks in 1913, they retained their Brooklyn identity despite moving to Dexter Park, which was actually located in Queens on the Brooklyn border. Rosner understood that the best talent wins ballgames and that good teams draw bigger crowds, and so he continually poured his revenues back into player contracts and improvements to his ballpark. Despite some annoying grammatical issues, the first chapter finishes fairly strong, leaving readers hungry for more. Beginning with chapter two, Barthel's heavy reliance on newspaper sources threatens to derail the entire project. What follows is a handful of incredibly interesting stories buried beneath a year-by-year recounting of box scores, delivered in a style that might be called "Bill James-lite." Like James in his Baseball Abstracts, Barthel's tone is conversational, yet authoritative. At times, he even manages to create that sense of "being there," allowing the reader to get a strong, personal sense of historical context. Unfortunately, Barthel lacks the wit and sharp analytical eye of James. Barthel's strength is offering a detailed chronicle of baseball history; those looking for new insights or probing cultural analysis will not find much of either in Baseball's Peerless Semipros. That is not to say, however, that we should completely disregard Barthel's latest book. The problems with the text primarily have to do with style and documentation (as just one example of many errors, there is no in-text citation for the first endnote). But Baseball's Peerless Semipros does offer a fuller understanding of the importance of semipro teams like the Bushwicks to Negro league baseball. So long as the competition was strong and willing to travel to Dexter Park, Max Rosner's Bushwicks took on all challengers, regardless of skin color. So strong was that connection, in fact, that when television and integration brought an end to the Negro leagues, the semipro clubs faded with them, due in no small part to the loss...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,124

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0370,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,177 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207