Marginal Subjects: Gender and Deviance in Fin-de-siècle Spain (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Marginal Subjects: Gender and Deviance in Fin-de-siècle Spain Lou Charnon-Deutsch Keywords Deviancy, Prostitution, Gender, Sexuality, Subjectivity, Lou Charnon-Deutsch, Akiko Tsuchiya Tsuchiya, Akiko. Marginal Subjects: Gender and Deviance in Fin-de-siècle Spain. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2011. xiii + 277 pp. The question posed in this book is to what extent the gender deviant in nineteenth-century Spanish novels plays a significant role in challenging socially established norms by negotiating new forms of subjectivity and agency. Fans of Tsuchiya’s decades-long research on the late-nineteenth-century novel will applaud this comprehensive exploration of the productive deployment of gender deviancy in canonical writers Galdós, Clarín, and Pardo Bazán, as well as lesser known naturalist writers Eduardo López Bago and Matilde Cherner. The conclusion Tsuchiya draws is that nineteenth-century novels to a greater or lesser degree create a space where subjects are able to mobilize resistance to the normalizing discourses of a society that was increasingly concerned with observing, classifying, and disciplining subjects who challenge bourgeois ideals of gender conduct. In a series of tightly argued, character-based case studies, Marginal Subjects argues that the persistent use of the gender deviant trope in Spanish fiction indicates anxieties about social and national identities, especially about women in a changing society in which it was feared that gender indifferentiation posed a threat. These deviant subjects, some male, but mostly female, differ in the degree of agency they are able to exercise over their bodies and identities, producing in some cases “significant fissures in Restoration society’s dominant structures of power and knowledge.” Some novels, notably Clarín’s Su único hijo, in the end tend to reinstate (although [End Page 107] not entirely successfully) prevailing gender norms, and others, such as those of López Bago, reveal male desire and fantasies resulting in a reinscription of deviant subjects within dominant patriarchal paradigms despite the author’s politically progressive agenda. Novels by Galdós, on the other hand, reveal the author’s deep ambivalence about gender transgression. For their part, Pardo Bazán and Cherner, like many women writers of their generation, tend to be more self-aware as writers, slipping less readily into conventions of the male gaze in the construction of their narrators, and yet they do not always open spaces for a richer feminine subjectivity. The introduction rehearses the various social and historical factors that are relevant to the discussion of deviancy in the last decades of the nineteenth century, a very useful and informative review of the subject written, as always, in Tsuchiya’s clear and cogent style. Chapters One and Two on Galdós’s La desheredada and Fortunata y Jacinta examine the constant negotiation of the subjectivity of the characters Isidora, Fortunata, and Mauricia, calling attention to the instability of the boundary between the normal and the deviant through the women’s conscious deployment of their own bodies. Isidora and Fortunata especially pose a threat both to class and gender boundaries by pursuing their own course of desire and negotiating their own places within the culture of consumption instead of remaining passive objects of masculine sexual pleasure and contemplation. Isidora “generates her own end to the story” of her deviancy by escaping the prescriptive measures urged on her by Miquis and other characters, while Fortunata refuses inscription in the bourgeois family and other spatial enclosures meant to correct her deviancy. No “docile body,” to use Sandra Bartky’s term, Mauricia refuses to submit her disordered body to discipline; even her mental disorder and death, according to Tsuchiya, are a form of resistance, a strategy in defiance of the bourgeois codes that seek to constrain her. Pardo Bazán’s Amparo, on the contrary, is not as convincingly transgressive as the characters examined in the first two chapters. The subject of Chapter Three is the representation of both visual and literary women readers, among whom Amparo is one of the most fascinating examples. This chapter offers an unusual teaming of the visual and the literary that reinforces the identification between female reading and sexual transgression that raised anxiety about women’s education, social progress and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».