Restoration of hepatic mast cells and expression of a different mast cell protease phenotype in regenerating rat liver after 70%‐hepatectomy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mast cells (MC) can undergo significant changes in number and phenotype; these alterations result in the differential expression of growth factors and cytokines. Kit ligand (KL; stem cell factor) is produced by mesenchymal cells, and in the liver by biliary epithelial cells. Recent studies suggest that KL, and its receptor c-kit, may be involved in liver regeneration after loss of liver mass. However, KL is also the major growth, differentiating, chemotactic, and activating factor for MC. The aim of our study was to elucidate the dynamics and phenotype of hepatic MC and KL/c-kit expression during liver regeneration after partial (70%) hepatectomy in the rat. Regenerating livers were harvested after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days, respectively (n = 6 each day). MC were stained for naphthol-AS/D-chloroacetate esterase and counted as MC per bile ductule. MC phenotype was assessed by rat MC protease (RMCP)-1 and -2 immunofluorescence staining, in order to distinguish RMCP-1 positive connective tissue MC (CTMC) from RMCP-2 positive mucosa MC (MMC). mRNA expression of RMCP, c-kit, and the differentially spliced variants of KL was quantified by RT-PCR. MC counts per bile ductule decreased in regenerating rat liver tissue at day 3, compared with native livers, and became normal thereafter. Hepatic MC were predominantly of a CTMC phenotype expressing RMCP-1, as previously published; after hepatectomy, between 76 and 99% of all MC double-expressed RMCP-1 and -2, compatible with an MMC phenotype. The ratio of the two alternatively spliced mRNAs for KL (KL-1 : KL-2), and c-kit mRNA expression did not differ significantly between regenerating livers and the livers of sham operated animals. These results suggest that hepatic mast cells are restored during liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in the rat. Restored MC express an MMC phenotype, suggesting migration from outside into the regenerating liver. Alternative splicing of KL is affected by the surgical procedure in general, and, together with its receptor c-kit, doesn't seem to be involved in liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in the rat. Further functional studies, and studies in regenerating human livers might offer the possibility of elucidating the role of the hepatic mast cell, and its different protease phenotypes during liver regeneration after surgical loss of liver mass.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».