International Conference on Perception and Action no Brasil
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Brazil has received a large amount of international attention in recent years.The accomplishments of obtaining the rights to host both the World Cup, in 2014, and the Olympic Games, in 2016, are the best examples of this attention.Nevertheless, Brazilian notoriety is not restricted to sports events.The rising number of Brazilian scientific journals internationally indexed and the number of international events taking place in Brazil are demonstrations that this Brazilian prominence extends to the scientific area.Considering this context, in 2011 Brazil will host for the first time the International Conference on Perception and Action -ICPA.The ICPA is a scientific event idealized by the International Society for Ecological Psychology (ISEP) and had its first meeting in Storrs (Connecticut, United States) in 1981.The ICPA is a biannual conference which has been based in different countries such as the United States, Switzerland, Italy, Holland, France, Canada, Scotland, Australia and Japan.As a sign of recognition for the Brazilian's scientific development, the sixteenth edition of the ICPA will take place in Brazil, specifically in Ouro Preto (Minas Gerais).The main objective of the ICPA is to promote a scientific meeting of graduate students and scientists from different backgrounds and areas of expertise in order to promote discussions of themes related to perception and action.Traditionally, the ICPA promotes the opportunity for presenting scientific data, methodological developments and theoretical discussions.Themes of the presentations and discussions include: perception based on information, perceptual learning, cognition, neurodynamics, robotic, action and speech coordination, perceptualmotor development, among others.The proposal of the experimental psychologist James Gibson, that the behavior of the biological systems in their more distinct levels (motor, perceptual, cognitive or social) is regulated by natural laws, permeates the different themes that have traditionally been addressed and discussed on ICPA.The ICPA -16 will include eight symposiums with three presentations each from researchers under themes that include the role of action and perception, physical intelligence, coordination, deficits in social coordination in pathological conditions, perception and action learning, among others.In addition to the symposiums, the conference will include the presentation of free themes followed by discussions and presentations of studies in the format of posters.The sixteenth edition of the ICPA already has international recognition with confirmed participation of speakers from France, Japan, Holland, Belgium, Norway and United States.The achievement of the ICPA in Brazil will be a singular opportunity to disseminate not only the event to our country's researches but also the themes and the theoretical referential adopted by the different participants.v Rev Bras Fisioter.2011;15(3):v-vi.v Considering this, we expect that the ICPA-16 will contribute to the growth and consolidation of investigations in the field of perception and action that are developed in different centers of research based in Brazil.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».