MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2028135642 · doi:10.1145/1148109.1148149

An implementation report for parallel triangular decompositions

2006· article· en· W2028135642 sur OpenAlexaff
Marc Moreno Maza, Yuzhen Xie

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiquePolynomial and algebraic computation
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolynomialComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Set (abstract data type)Algebraic numberAlgebraic geometryComputationTheoretical computer scienceSet operationsDimension (graph theory)Algebra over a fieldAlgorithmMathematicsPure mathematicsProgramming language

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Since the discovery of Gröbner bases, the algorithmic advances in Commutative Algebra have made possible to tackle many classical problems in Algebraic Geometry that were previously out of reach. However, algorithmic progress is still desirable, for instance when solving symbolically a large system of algebraic non-linear equations. For such a system, in particular if its solution set consists of geometric components of different dimension (points, curves, surfaces, etc) it is necessary to combine Gröbner bases with decomposition techniques, such as triangular decompositions. Ideally, one would like each of the different components to be produced by an independent processor, or set of processors. In practice, the input polynomial system, which is hiding those components, requires some transformations in order to split the computations into sub-systems and, then, lead to the desired components. The efficiency of this approach depends on its ability to detect and exploit geometrical information during the solving process.Our work addresses two questions: How to discover geometrical information, at an early stage of the solving process, that would be favorable to parallel execution? How to ensure load balancing among the processors? We answer these questions in the context of triangular decompositions [2] which are a popular way of solving polynomial systems symbolically. These methods tend to split the input polynomial system into subsystems and, therefore, are natural candidate for parallel implementation. However, the only such method which has been parallelized so far is the Characteristic Set Method of Wu [5], as reported in [1, 6]. This approach suffers from several limitations. For instance, the solving of the second component cannot start before that of the first one is completed; this is a limitation in view of coarse-grain parallelization.In [4] an algorithm, called Triade, for TRIAngular DEcompositions, provides a good management of the intermediate computations for triangular decompositions. It is also a natural candidate for coarse-grain parallel implementation based on geometrical considerations; indeed the number of working processors can depend on the intrinsic difficulty of the system to solve. However, several challenges remain to be considered. First, load balancing is very difficult to control due to irregular tasks. Even worse: for some input polynomial systems, especially with integer coefficients, resource consuming tasks may not be necessarily executed concurrently. Second, data communication overhead can be very heavy due to large intermediate results.In order to achieve load balancing we rely on the following facts. For an input polynomial system, the Triade algorithm generates the intermediate or output components by decreasing order of dimension. As a consequence, expensive tasks (those in lower dimension) can be processed concurrently. In addition, when solving a (non-trivial) polynomial system modulo a prime integer, the number of these tasks is sufficient for expecting a good speed-up in a parallel execution. The case of polynomial systems with integer coefficients can also benefit from these features by using the modular techniques introduced in [3].We have developed a parallel scheme for the Triade algorithm, aiming at minimizing data communication overhead. Tasks are scheduled and updated by a process manager. Individual tasks are solved "lazily" by process workers. However, each process worker keeps track of enough information such that it can continue the solving of some of these tasks, when needed.We have realized a preliminary implementation on a shared memory multiprocessor. The experimental results show a satisfactory speed-up for some well-known problems.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,608
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,226

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPolynomial and algebraic computationTravaux en français237 207