MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2028628285 · doi:10.1353/cat.2006.0154

Synod and Synodality: Theology, History, Canon Law and Ecumenism in New Contact (review)

2006· article· en· W2028628285 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francis A. Sullivan

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheology and Canon Law Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSynodEcumenismBishopsCanon lawProtestantismTheologyLawChristianityHistoryClassicsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Synod and Synodality, Theology, History, Canon Law and Ecumenism in New Contact Francis A. Sullivan S.J. Synod and Synodality, Theology, History, Canon Law and Ecumenism in New Contact. Edited by Alberto Melloni and Silvia Scatena. [Christianity and History: Series of the John XXIII Foundation for Religious Studies in Bologna, Vol. 1.] (Münster: LIT Verlag. 2005. Pp. iv, 720. €69,90 paperback.) This volume contains thirty papers that were presented at an international colloquium that was held at Bruges in 2003 on the topic: "Synod and Synodality in the Churches." Half of the papers are in English; the rest are in French (7), Italian (7), and Spanish (1). An abstract of each paper is provided in English. The papers are grouped under seven topic headings: "Theological Foundation," "Historical Depth," "19th-20th Century," "Synodality at 'Regional' Level," "Panorama on Some Cases of Roman Catholic Synodality," "Central Government and Communion," and "Some Case Studies in Decision Making and Synodal Practice." While the majority of the papers focus on the Catholic Church, [End Page 268] other churches whose experience of synodality is treated are the Russian Orthodox, Anglican, Reformed, Baptist, and Methodist. The colloquium is noteworthy for the number of different synodal structures that are discussed. Those in the Catholic Church are the consistory, diocesan synods, national synods, national pastoral councils, regional synods, episcopal conferences, councils or federations of episcopal conferences, and the Synod of Bishops. Those elsewhere are the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church (1917–18), synodical government in Anglican and Protestant churches, the proposed European Protestant Synod, and the World Council of Churches. The international character of the colloquium is reflected in the number of countries or regions in which the practice of synodality in the churches is described: Russia, England, Germany, Canada, India, Latin America, West Africa, Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland. In most cases, the authors are members of the churches and citizens of the countries about which they write. Since it is impossible in a brief review to do justice to the rich contents of the thirty contributions to this colloquium, I shall mention only two that I think likely to be of particular interest to the readers of this journal. Paolo Bernardini's contribution is a survey of the major studies that have been published concerning the African councils of the third century, beginning with the first of the series of articles by J. A. Fischer (1979). He notes that the authors of these studies have not only further analyzed the information to be found in the letters of Cyprian, but have also mined the Sententiae LXXXVII Episcoporum with good results. These studies have also shown that the process of decision-making in these councils reflects not only that of the Roman senate, but also that commonly used in contemporary municipal councils. Maria Teresa Fattori describes the transition that took place in the latter half of the sixteenth century from the synodal form of papal government, that gave a major role to the consistory, to the centralized government that was effected by the pope's use of the Congregation of the Inquisition as his instrument for carrying out the reform of the Church. Despite the efforts of Gregory XIII to reverse this trend, by the end of the century, the consistory no longer played a significant role in papal government. The editors are to be commended for making this informative collection of studies available to the public. The abstracts in English will be appreciated by those who might not have the time to read all the papers, especially those in other languages. The authors have provided a generous amount of bibliographical information in their footnotes. The volume includes an index of names. Francis A. Sullivan S.J. Boston College Copyright © 2006 The Catholic University of America Press

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,042

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œCatholic historical reviewMême sujetTheology and Canon Law StudiesTravaux en français237 207