MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2029557783 · doi:10.1177/002070200606100203

China's Economic Transformation

2006· article· en· W2029557783 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobalization, Economics, and Policies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChinaTransformation (genetics)Political scienceEconomic transformationEconomic reformEconomic systemEconomicsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Year after year China's economic transformation is the top cover story. Frequently the commentary is polarized between breathless optimism and suspicious skepticism, which usually means the truth lies somewhere in between. This will be true of many views and statements in this article because of diversity in a huge country and because of rapid change. Indeed, where all can agree is that China's re-emergence as a world economic power after a hiatus of several hundred years is a dramatic accomplishment. Some of the Asian tigers have done better on export-led growth, but no economy of this size has reformed and opened so quickly.Consider some of the numbers:* Growth: For 25 years China has been the world's fastest growing economy; 9-10 percent annual growth means that the economy doubles in size every seven or eight years.* Size: Using a purchasing power parity measure, China is already the world's second largest economy after the United States. Measured by current exchange rates, its economy is the world's sixth largest after the United States, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and France, and will soon be the fourth largest.* Integration through foreign direct investment (FDI): In the past five years China has emerged as a global manufacturer and trader because of FDI inflows. In the past four years it has received the largest absolute inflows (although round-tripping through Hong Kong is a contributing factor).* Integration through trade: In 2005, the size of its total trade (imports plus exports) surpassed Japan's to make it the world's third largest trader.These numbers need to be put in perspective in at least three ways. First, even when China becomes the world's largest economy, its average citizen will still be relatively poor. It has been said that China will grow old before it becomes rich. Second, many of the superlatives apply to three city clusters, in the Pearl River Delta, around Shanghai, and around Beijing, where huge building programs and infrastructure projects have propelled more than 140 million people to first-world status. Third, we cannot talk about the future without understanding thousands of years of history. Going back just to the 1949 revolution, private property was abolished and today attitudes remain ambivalent towards property rights despite their importance as a key building block of a modern market economy. Even so, the past 30 years provide a remarkable record of successful economic policies. China's managers are doing many of the right things to create a transparent market economy, but major political constraints remain because of the communist party's determination to maintain its grip on political power and on the commanding heights of the economy.My purpose in this article is to assess China's transformation using a long-term economic growth framework and to explore the implications for the rest of us. I will do this by reviewing the main drivers of growth: inputs of capital, labour, land, and new technologies, as well as the role of key institutions, and then discuss some of the main implications for the world economy and for Canada in particular.PROSPECTS FOR SUSTAINED LONG-TERM GROWTHMainstream economists agree that sustained growth is determined by inputs and technology, but also by institutions. In particular, government's role should be to provide the necessary frameworks for an efficient market economy. It should improve the economy's ability to reallocate resources from failure to opportunity. It should contribute a strong human resource base, encourage flexible labour markets, and provide social safety nets. And it should provide an incentive framework, including a strong and resilient financial system, which supports and rewards innovation. I keep these benchmarks in mind in the following discussion.The role of capital and financial markets in long-term growthChina has the world's highest saving rate, at 43 percent of GDP, and an investment-to-GDP ratio of more than 45 percent. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,398
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle