Hell's Corner: An Illustrated History of Canada's Great War: 1914-1918 (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Hell's Corner: An Illustrated History of Canada's Great War: 1914-1918 Tim Cook Hell's Corner: An Illustrated History of Canada's Great War: 1914-1918. J.L. Granatstein. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2004. Pp. 198, illus. $50.00 Canada's First World War experience has almost entirely slipped into historical memory. Of the more than 620,000 Canadians who enlisted between 1914 and 1918, only a handful are still alive. Yet even before the last shot was fired on 11 November 1918, contemporaries were arguing about what the war meant to Canada. Some ascribed to it the birth of the nation on the slopes of Vimy, or at least the emergence of a distinct Canadian identity. Others questioned the extremity of a war effort that nearly tore the country apart along regional, class, and linguistic lines. Few can deny that the 60,000 dead and enormous home front exertions forever changed Canada and its peoples. It should be no surprise, then, that historians continue to fight and refight these old battles. There have been hundreds of monographs devoted to all aspects of the war, and the publications continue unabated. J.L. Granatstein, one of Canada's leading historians, who writes in numerous fields, including, but not limited to, national, political, military, and contemporary history, has already contributed significantly to First World War historiography. And while this latest offering breaks no new interpretive ground, it is still a work that is worthy of scholars' attention. Granatstein has provided a succinct and expert overview of the war, based on new primary research and an understanding of the most recent literature. As the subtitle notes, this is an illustrated history, and Hell's Corner's strength is its use of photographs, sketches, works of art, and first-hand accounts that have never been published before. Full-page colour reproductions from artists like A.Y. Jackson and F.H. Varley are simply stunning and a welcome relief from the usual bland images associated with most academic works. The narrative unfolds chronologically, from the outbreak of war, through to the opening and costly battles of 1915 and 1916. Granatstein's vivid writing style, when combined with eyewitness reportage, provides insight into the trials of trench warfare. 'Death has no horrors for anyone here, at least for those who have been here a few weeks or more,' wrote Ramsey Morris. Granatstein is experienced enough to recognize that the letter could reveal a true sentiment, as it was repeated by countless soldiers, or simply comforting bravado expressed to worried parents. This is a history in which Canadian soldiers, and their overseas experiences, are front and centre. The learning curve of battle is analysed in the [End Page 549] 1917 and 1918 campaigns, from Vimy to the Hundred Days, and Granatstein uses these and other events to explore the elite reputation of Canadian troops. But this is not simply heroic history, and there is no shying away from some of the war's controversies, like the killing of prisoners in battle or executions by firing squad for various military offences. First World War experts will have their quibbles with the weighting of various parts of the book, but hard choices must always be made in overviews. That said, the emphasis of Hell's Corner is on the firing line, and a more balanced book would have provided greater insight into the home front experience. The abrupt ending also fails to fully explore the impact of the war on Canada. Attractively presented and evocatively written, Hell's Corner will be read across the country. Granatstein's forty years of academic experience, authorship of more than fifty books, and willingness to dig out new research, makes him an ideal historian to incorporate the latest scholarship into this popular history. Indeed, one could argue that unless academic historians begin to offer more popular histories, we run the risk of embracing the slow abdication of historical knowledge to less-qualified journalists or writers. This book may not change First World War historiography, but perhaps its greatest contribution is an example to historians on how to reconnect Canadian history to those interested in their collective past. Tim Cook Canadian...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,015 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».