MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2029635038 · doi:10.1002/ebch.723

Cochrane review: Short versus standard duration antibiotic therapy for acute streptococcal pharyngitis in children

2011· article· en· W2029635038 sur OpenAlexaff
Saleh Karamah AL‐Tamimi, Adli Khalil, Khalid A Khalaiwi, Ruth Milner, Martin Pusic, Mohammed A Al Othman

Notice bibliographique

RevueEvidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePharyngitisPenicillinAcute PharyngitisCochrane LibraryAntibioticsRandomized controlled trialInternal medicinePediatrics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background The standard duration of treatment for acute group A beta hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) pharyngitis with oral penicillin is 10 days. Shorter duration antibiotics may have comparable efficacy. Objectives To summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy of two to six days of newer oral antibiotics (short duration) compared to 10 days of oral penicillin (standard duration) in treating children with acute GABHS pharyngitis. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, issue 4), which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register; the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); MEDLINE (1966 to October 2007); OLDMEDLINE (1950 to December 1965); and EMBASE (January 1990 to November 2007). Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short duration oral antibiotics to standard duration oral penicillin in children aged 1 to 18 years with acute GABHS pharyngitis. Data collection and analysis Two review authors scanned the titles and abstracts of retrieved citations and applied the inclusion criteria. We retrieved included studies in full and extracted data. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality. Main results Twenty studies were included with 13,102 cases of acute GABHS pharyngitis. Compared to standard duration treatment, the short duration treatment had shorter periods of fever (mean difference (MD) ‐0.30 days, 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.14) and throat soreness (MD ‐0.50 days, 95% CI ‐0.78 to ‐0.22); lower risk of early clinical treatment failure (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94); no significant difference in early bacteriological treatment failure (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.20), or late clinical recurrence (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). However, the overall risk of late bacteriological recurrence was worse in the short duration treatment (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48), although no significant differences were found when studies of low dose azithromycin (10mg/kg) were eliminated (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.22). Three studies reported long duration complications with no statistically significant difference (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.64). Authors' conclusions Three to six days of oral antibiotics had comparable efficacy compared to the standard duration 10 day oral penicillin in treating children with acute GABHS pharyngitis. In countries with low rates of rheumatic fever, it appears safe and efficacious to treat children with acute GABHS pharyngitis with short duration antibiotics. In areas where the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease is still high, our results must be interpreted with caution. Plain Language Summary The effect of short duration versus standard duration antibiotic therapy for streptococcal throat infection in children Streptococcal throat infection is very common. A 10‐day course of penicillin is prescribed mainly to protect against the complication of acute rheumatic fever, which occurs approximately 20 days after streptococcal throat or scarlet fever, and causes damage to the heart valves. Cases of acute rheumatic fever have dropped dramatically in high‐income countries, with an annual incidence amongst school‐aged children of 0.5 cases per 100,000, compared to 100 to 200 cases per 100,000 in low‐income countries. Newer antibiotics, taken for a shorter duration, may have a comparable effect to penicillin taken for 10 days. We summarized the evidence in the medical literature regarding the effect of two to six days of oral antibiotics (short duration) in treating children with streptococcal throat infection, compared with 10 days of oral penicillin (standard duration). We searched the literature from 1951 to November 2007. Twenty studies were included with a total of 13,102 cases of streptococcal throat infection. The most common antibiotic studied was azithromycin (n = 6). Compared to standard duration, the short duration treatment had a shorter period of fever (mean difference (MD) ‐0.30 days, 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.14) and sore throat (MD ‐0.50, 95% CI ‐0.78 to ‐0.22), and lower risk of early clinical treatment failure (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94), but there was no significant difference in early bacteriological treatment failure (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.20), or late clinical recurrence (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). The overall risk of late bacteriological recurrence was worse in the short duration treatment (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48). However, no significant difference was found when eliminating studies of low‐dose azithromycin (10 mg/kg) (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.22). The short duration treatment resulted in better compliance (non‐compliance OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.29), but more side effects (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.21). All side effects were self‐limiting: mostly mild to moderate diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Three studies reported the rate of long duration complications with no statistically significant difference (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.64). Three to six days of oral antibiotics for children with streptococcal (strep) throat infection is a safe treatment with a comparable effect to the standard duration of 10 days of penicillin. However, our results must be interpreted with caution in low‐income countries where acute rheumatic fever is still a problem.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,036

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,027
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0120,007
Bibliométrie0,0060,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,078
Tête enseignante GPT0,417
Écart entre enseignants0,339 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEvidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review JournalMême sujetStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207