MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2030723026 · doi:10.1353/can.2012.0045

Georges and Pauline Vanier: Portrait of a Couple (review)

2012· article· en· W2030723026 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Terry Crowley

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPortraitPoliticsBiographyHistoryArt historyArchivistLiteratureLawArtPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Georges and Pauline Vanier: Portrait of a Couple Terry Crowley Georges and Pauline Vanier: Portrait of a Couple. Mary Frances Coady. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011. Pp. 296, $34.95 Hybridity is under-appreciated by Canadian historians. Now that multiculturalism has fallen from fashion, the mongrel nature of Canadians and their institutions provides a variety of fascinating byways and combinations to assist historians in interpreting Canada’s past. Mongel was once a pejorative word of derision, but hybrid vigour has gained new élan through globalization and by expert breeding. The office of governor general, for example, is clearly hybrid. Inherited from the French regime and transmuted by British imperialists, the position sits today at the summit of the state in Canada, though under the monarch. Being above the political fray, the governor general represents the entire nation and thus avoids the inconveniences that help to mark American political structures as so frequently lamentable. Historical biography is itself a hybrid, drawing on literary traditions to explore the lives of individuals and reflecting the historian’s penchant for primary source research and non-fiction realism. The development in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries of what was thought to be the science of history drove a wedge between literary art and historical veracity. These ideas were perpetrated by male practitioners ensconced largely in academic institutions. The supposed divorce between biography and history that was often proclaimed enhanced the status of male scholars, who were often poorly paid, and set them apart from women, amateurs, and popularisers. In an era of greater [End Page 514] hybridity, such distinctions need no longer be entertained. What is important is how well a book is researched and written, or how poorly, and what it contributes to historical understanding. Joint biographies constitute a hybrid of a hybrid, often as difficult to reconcile as Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons. They are rare, partially because the productive lives of women and men have differed so radically in history that narratives of domestic interaction are seldom able to integrate divergent career paths pursued outside the home. For a pair such as Georges Vanier and Pauline Archer, the country’s second Canadian vice-regal couple after Alice and Vincent Massey, this disparity becomes a liability in the first book devoted to them jointly. The future Pauline Vanier is not introduced until page 53, after a full account of her future husband’s family background and the exciting events of his military career during the First World War. Pauline’s married and then widowed life is interwoven throughout the book, but she never really catches up with George. Pauline Vanier was born into a Quebec family of wealth and standing with an anglophone father and ancestors who included Charles-Michel De Salaberry. She chose a conventional route of mother, with ample child support, and served as consort and courtesan to her husband’s diplomatic and political career. She served as an active volunteer but lived her life without the independent mind displayed by Norah Mitchener or Gabrielle Léger. This lifestyle led Pauline to question her self-worth and to adopt during her latter years a near monastic existence in France near her son Jean, who founded L’Arche – a global movement to assist the mentally challenged. Georges Vanier was similarly hybrid in family background, a mixing of anglophone and francophone stock once despised by Quebec nationalists but that nevertheless equipped him to handle the new exigencies of twentieth-century Canada. His service as an officer during the First World War was so exemplary that he received the Distinguished Service Order, the Military Cross, and the designation Chevalier de Légion d’Honneur. Georges Vanier was shell-shocked during the war and had a leg amputated, but as adjutant he still took charge of an execution for desertion from Montreal’s Royal 22nd Regiment. Bodily dismemberment momentarily shook his masculine psyche until Pauline, ten years his junior, agreed to marry him. His career in Canada’s fledging foreign service from the 1920s appeared without major consequence other than in his ability to bridge the chasm that often divided Canada’s two major language groups. Writer...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,983
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,061

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0180,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207