MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2031242323 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.177261

Exercising an option to prevent age related decline of vascular BH<sub>4</sub> and uncoupling of eNOS

2009· letter· en· W2031242323 sur OpenAlexaff
James W. E. Rush

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Physiology · 2009
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnosTetrahydrobiopterinVasodilationInternal medicineVascular smooth muscleNitric oxideEndocrinologyAgeingBrachial arteryCardiologyEndotheliumSkeletal muscleMedicineNitric oxide synthaseBiologyBlood pressureSmooth muscle

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It is well documented that skeletal muscle vascular conductance and endothelium-dependent vasodilatation are reduced with ageing. Studies utilizing isolated skeletal muscle arterioles reveal that age-related deficits involve, at least in part, alterations in the NO signalling pathway (Muller-Delp et al. 2002; Delp et al. 2008). Although manifold factors could contribute to age-related declines in NO-mediated function, recent studies highlight the potential importance of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) cofactor. When BH4 is limited, eNOS can become uncoupled and produce superoxide instead of NO. Thus, BH4 is potentially of junctional importance in the link between NO, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and vascular function. In humans, a single oral dose of BH4 restored endothelium-dependent dilatation in the conduit brachial artery of sedentary older men (Eskurza et al. 2005). Furthermore, Delp et al. (2008) demonstrated that age-related declines in flow-mediated dilatation of rat soleus muscle arterioles resulted, at least in part, from limitations in availability of the eNOS cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), and that administration of the BH4 precursor sepiapterin improved flow-induced dilatation in vessels from aged rats. These results collectively support the argument that interventions to preserve vascular BH4 may be a therapeutic option for age-related vascular dysfunction (Pierce & LaRocca, 2008). In the current issue of The Journal of Physiology, Sindler et al. proposed to determine if age-related declines in vascular BH4 were associated with eNOS uncoupling and ROS production, and whether these age-related changes could be reversed by a therapeutic exercise training intervention. Aerobic exercise training has previously been shown to blunt or eliminate age-dependent declines in NO-mediated endothelium-dependent dilatation and to improve skeletal muscle blood flow in a variety of models (Seals et al. 2008), and the study of Sindler et al. proposes to add novel understanding of the underlying mechanisms related to BH4. The approach is integrative, combining functional assessment of vasodilatation with biochemical measurements of BH4, NO and ROS production, all in isolated arterioles from the soleus muscle under a number of controlled pharmacological conditions. As expected, flow-mediated dilatation was impaired with ageing and restored by exercise training; novel observations point to potential underlying mechanisms: age-related reduction in BH4 occurred in conjunction with decline in flow-induced NO signalling, and increase in superoxide production (eNOS uncoupling); and exercise training prevented the age-related loss of BH4 and improved NO bio-availability by balancing accelerated NO and ROS production. These results extend the appreciation of oxidative stress impacting NO bio-availability and vasomotor function beyond the traditional, but insufficient, concept of NO destruction by ROS (Rush et al. 2005). The findings of the study of Sindler et al. are timely, reported roughly contemporaneously with identification of the need for pharmacological therapies directed toward a similar result, the restoration of BH4 in aged blood vessels. This creates a discovery environment in which potential pharmacological- and exercise-oriented approaches to the problem will undoubtedly co-evolve. The findings of Sindler et al. additionally serve as a progenitor for many hypotheses regarding BH4 in vascular adaptations to age and exercise. Fundamental questions raised include those related to identifying the cellular mechanisms accounting for age-related declines and exercise-related restoration of vascular BH4. In this regard, emerging data suggest that H2O2 is a regulatory factor controlling BH4 synthesis in vascular cells via induction of the enzyme GTP-cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH; Shimizu et al. 2003). The data of Sindler et al. indicate that H2O2 contributes to flow-induced dilatation of skeletal muscle arterioles of young sedentary animals and that, like the flow-induced dilatation functional response itself, this H2O2 signalling declines with age but is restored by exercise training. Is it possible that this same pattern of H2O2 signalling could contribute to maintenance of BH4 in young arterioles, its loss with age, and its restoration with exercise in aged arterioles, consistent with the indicated effect of H2O2 on GTPCH expression and BH4 synthesis? If so, H2O2 takes on another important role in the acute and chronic regulation of vascular function. A recurring theme in vascular biology is heterogeneity in phenotype and function depending on vessel type (conduit vs. resistance), location (vascular bed), and physiological circumstances (e.g. other conditions in vivo). While these considerations are in part cautionary regarding the global interpretation of the results of Sindler et al., they can more appropriately be seen as an invitation for additional studies designed to create a more integrative understanding of cellular mechanisms of vascular ageing and the therapeutic effects of exercise. The study of Sindler et al. creates a new paradigm justifying such an invitation with respect to BH4, vasomotor function and the regulation of skeletal muscle blood flow.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Physiology→Même sujetNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects→Travaux en français237 207→