MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2031742246 · doi:10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00045.x

Promoting Ethical Conduct in the Publication of Research

2008· editorial· en· W2031742246 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCardiovascular Therapeutics · 2008
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomainePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
ThématiquePharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHonestyEngineering ethicsTransparency (behavior)MedicineConflict of interestPublic relationsLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Adhering to sound principles in the practice of scientific research is vital and maintaining these practices in the publication of this research is a necessity. Because there is strength in unified voice and these principles are of common interest, the editors of the leading international cardiovascular journals, including Cardiovascular Therapeutics, have developed a document that lists ethical principles that editors and authors can readily embrace. The document, published in this issue, highlights the importance of avoiding conflict of interest, plagiarism, excessive claims, and establishing guidelines for authorship. We believe these principles will establish sound publication standards for authors and editors alike. Over the past several years, the editors of leading international cardiovascular journals have met to form the HEART group and to discuss areas of growing, common interest. Recently, the HEART group has developed a document that addresses general ethical principles in the conduct of the scientific process with which all of the editors concur. Published essentially simultaneously in all of the participating journals, including this Journal, this document presents the ethical tenets accepted by all of the undersigned editors that will (continue to) guide their decisions in the editorial process. These are the general principles on which the HEART group is based and by which we, as a group, abide; however, please note that individual journal members and their respective societies may have their own rules and regulations that supersede the guidelines of the HEART group. The purpose of this is to ensure transparency and honesty in the scientific process that promotes ethical conduct in the performance and publication of research. The following will be considered as parts of this process: Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest for all involved in the performance of research and in the evaluation and publication process of a manuscript. Relevant relationships with commercial interests will be defined in terms of levels and nature of support. The nature of support will be listed as grants, supplies/equipment, type of employment, or personal income. Equity and royalty interests should be stated as well as any fiduciary relationship with the sponsor. Establish thorough review processes, particularly alert to discovering scientific fraud and data falsification, redundant or duplicate publication, and plagiarism, and to adopt a uniform standard of dealing with authors guilty of fraudulent practices. Maintain confidentiality and embargos where appropriate. Create uniform criteria to establish authorship. To qualify for authorship, individuals must have made substantial contributions to the intellectual content of the article in at least one of the following areas: conceived and designed the research, acquired the data, analyzed and interpreted the data, performed statistical analysis, handled funding and supervision, drafted the manuscript, or made critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Authors must give final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version to be published. For multicenter trials, individuals who accept direct responsibility for the manuscript should fully meet the criteria for authorship previously defined; contributors not meeting these criteria should be acknowledged. Note avoidance of false claims of ownership and priority by attention to previous publications. Establish avoidance of excessive claims of benefits of a product/technique in the publication as well as with news media. Note compliance with institutional review board requirements and, when appropriate, approved laboratory procedures for animal research, and that the research conforms to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Geneva Declaration, the Belmont Report, and Good Clinical Practices from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the submission conforms to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication” (http://www.ICMJE.org). Acta CardiologicaHugo Ector, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Patrizio Lancellotti, MDEditor-in-Chief American Journal of CardiologyWilliam C. Roberts, MDEditor-in-Chief American Journal of Geriatric CardiologyNanette K. Wenger, MDEditor-in-Chief Annals of Noninvasive ElectrocardiologyArthur J. Moss, MDEditor-in-Chief Canadian Journal of CardiologyEldon R. Smith, MDEditor-in-Chief CardiologyJeffrey S. Borer, MDEditor-in-Chief Cardiosource Review JournalKim A. Eagle, MDEditor-in-Chief Cardiovascular Drugs and TherapyWillem J. Remme, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Cardiovascular ResearchHans Michael Piper, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Cardiovascular TherapeuticsJane Freedman, MDEditor-In-Chief Henry Krum, PhDEditor-In-Chief Chim Lang, MDEditor-In-Chief Catheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsChristopher J. White, MDEditor-in-Chief CirculationJoseph Loscalzo, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Circulation ResearchEduardo Marban, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Coronary Artery DiseaseBurton E. Sobel, MDEditor Current Opinion in CardiologyRobert Roberts, MDEditor Current Problems in CardiologyShahbudin H. Rahimtoola, MDEditor EuropaceA. John Camm, MDEditor-in-Chief European Heart JournalFrans Van de Werf, MDEditor-in-Chief European Journal of Heart FailureKarl Swedberg, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief HeartAdam D. Timmis, MDEditor Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical CareKathleen S. Stone, PhD, RNEditor-in-Chief Heart RhythmDouglas P. Zipes, MDEditor-in-Chief International Journal of Interventional CardioangiologyDavid G. Iosseliani, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of Cardiovascular PharmacologyMichael R. Rosen, MDEditor Journal of Interventional CardiologyCindy L. Grines, MDEditor Journal of the American College of CardiologyAnthony N. DeMaria, MDEditor-in-Chief JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingJagat Narula, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief JACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsSpencer B. King III, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of ElectrocardiologyGalen S. Wagner, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of Interventional Cardiac ElectrophysiologySanjeev Saksena, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of the American Society of EchocardiographyAlan S. Pearlman, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of Heart Valve DiseaseRobert W. Emery, MDIncoming Editor-in-Chief Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryLawrence H. Cohn, MDEditor-in-Chief Netherlands Heart JournalErnst E. van der Wall, MDEditor-in-Chief Pediatric CardiologyRa-id Abdulla, MDEditor-in-Chief Progress in Cardiovascular DiseasesMichael Lesch, MDEditor Scandinavian Cardiovascular JournalRolf Ekroth, MDChief Editor

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,025
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,197
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0250,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,031
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,695
Tête enseignante GPT0,619
Écart entre enseignants0,076 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle