Promoting Ethical Conduct in the Publication of Research
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Adhering to sound principles in the practice of scientific research is vital and maintaining these practices in the publication of this research is a necessity. Because there is strength in unified voice and these principles are of common interest, the editors of the leading international cardiovascular journals, including Cardiovascular Therapeutics, have developed a document that lists ethical principles that editors and authors can readily embrace. The document, published in this issue, highlights the importance of avoiding conflict of interest, plagiarism, excessive claims, and establishing guidelines for authorship. We believe these principles will establish sound publication standards for authors and editors alike. Over the past several years, the editors of leading international cardiovascular journals have met to form the HEART group and to discuss areas of growing, common interest. Recently, the HEART group has developed a document that addresses general ethical principles in the conduct of the scientific process with which all of the editors concur. Published essentially simultaneously in all of the participating journals, including this Journal, this document presents the ethical tenets accepted by all of the undersigned editors that will (continue to) guide their decisions in the editorial process. These are the general principles on which the HEART group is based and by which we, as a group, abide; however, please note that individual journal members and their respective societies may have their own rules and regulations that supersede the guidelines of the HEART group. The purpose of this is to ensure transparency and honesty in the scientific process that promotes ethical conduct in the performance and publication of research. The following will be considered as parts of this process: Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest for all involved in the performance of research and in the evaluation and publication process of a manuscript. Relevant relationships with commercial interests will be defined in terms of levels and nature of support. The nature of support will be listed as grants, supplies/equipment, type of employment, or personal income. Equity and royalty interests should be stated as well as any fiduciary relationship with the sponsor. Establish thorough review processes, particularly alert to discovering scientific fraud and data falsification, redundant or duplicate publication, and plagiarism, and to adopt a uniform standard of dealing with authors guilty of fraudulent practices. Maintain confidentiality and embargos where appropriate. Create uniform criteria to establish authorship. To qualify for authorship, individuals must have made substantial contributions to the intellectual content of the article in at least one of the following areas: conceived and designed the research, acquired the data, analyzed and interpreted the data, performed statistical analysis, handled funding and supervision, drafted the manuscript, or made critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Authors must give final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version to be published. For multicenter trials, individuals who accept direct responsibility for the manuscript should fully meet the criteria for authorship previously defined; contributors not meeting these criteria should be acknowledged. Note avoidance of false claims of ownership and priority by attention to previous publications. Establish avoidance of excessive claims of benefits of a product/technique in the publication as well as with news media. Note compliance with institutional review board requirements and, when appropriate, approved laboratory procedures for animal research, and that the research conforms to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Geneva Declaration, the Belmont Report, and Good Clinical Practices from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the submission conforms to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication” (http://www.ICMJE.org). Acta CardiologicaHugo Ector, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Patrizio Lancellotti, MDEditor-in-Chief American Journal of CardiologyWilliam C. Roberts, MDEditor-in-Chief American Journal of Geriatric CardiologyNanette K. Wenger, MDEditor-in-Chief Annals of Noninvasive ElectrocardiologyArthur J. Moss, MDEditor-in-Chief Canadian Journal of CardiologyEldon R. Smith, MDEditor-in-Chief CardiologyJeffrey S. Borer, MDEditor-in-Chief Cardiosource Review JournalKim A. Eagle, MDEditor-in-Chief Cardiovascular Drugs and TherapyWillem J. Remme, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Cardiovascular ResearchHans Michael Piper, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Cardiovascular TherapeuticsJane Freedman, MDEditor-In-Chief Henry Krum, PhDEditor-In-Chief Chim Lang, MDEditor-In-Chief Catheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsChristopher J. White, MDEditor-in-Chief CirculationJoseph Loscalzo, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Circulation ResearchEduardo Marban, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief Coronary Artery DiseaseBurton E. Sobel, MDEditor Current Opinion in CardiologyRobert Roberts, MDEditor Current Problems in CardiologyShahbudin H. Rahimtoola, MDEditor EuropaceA. John Camm, MDEditor-in-Chief European Heart JournalFrans Van de Werf, MDEditor-in-Chief European Journal of Heart FailureKarl Swedberg, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief HeartAdam D. Timmis, MDEditor Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical CareKathleen S. Stone, PhD, RNEditor-in-Chief Heart RhythmDouglas P. Zipes, MDEditor-in-Chief International Journal of Interventional CardioangiologyDavid G. Iosseliani, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of Cardiovascular PharmacologyMichael R. Rosen, MDEditor Journal of Interventional CardiologyCindy L. Grines, MDEditor Journal of the American College of CardiologyAnthony N. DeMaria, MDEditor-in-Chief JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingJagat Narula, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief JACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsSpencer B. King III, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of ElectrocardiologyGalen S. Wagner, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of Interventional Cardiac ElectrophysiologySanjeev Saksena, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of the American Society of EchocardiographyAlan S. Pearlman, MDEditor-in-Chief Journal of Heart Valve DiseaseRobert W. Emery, MDIncoming Editor-in-Chief Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryLawrence H. Cohn, MDEditor-in-Chief Netherlands Heart JournalErnst E. van der Wall, MDEditor-in-Chief Pediatric CardiologyRa-id Abdulla, MDEditor-in-Chief Progress in Cardiovascular DiseasesMichael Lesch, MDEditor Scandinavian Cardiovascular JournalRolf Ekroth, MDChief Editor
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,025 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,031 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle