MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2031842385 · doi:10.4043/22102-ms

State of the Art in Satellite Surveillance of Icebergs and Sea Ice

2011· article· en· W2031842385 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Établissements canadiensCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSea iceIcebergArctic ice packEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceRemote sensingEnvironmental resource managementGeologyOceanography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The characterization of the ice environment is a necessary step in the probabilistic design approach of Arctic offshore structures. Without such knowledge, design uncertainty is high with the result being overly conservative designs with higher build costs to deal with the uncertainty associated with sea ice and iceberg loads. In addition to knowledge of the ice environment, the addition of ice management to operations leads to a lower risk of ice impact. When ice management is considered at the design stage, additional design concepts may be considered, which may also lead to lower build costs. A critical component to an effective ice management plan is tactical knowledge of the ice environment. Both tactical and historical knowledge of the ice environment can be achieved cost effectively using satellite monitoring. This paper examines the evolution of satellite SAR-based monitoring of sea ice and icebergs to support Arctic offshore operations, particularly for the oil and gas industry. The presentation will demonstrate, at a high level, how these data might be used by the industry, and how recent advances in satellite mapping technology add value to these services. Background In conducting safe and cost effective operations, ice management and risk mitigation practices are integral to operations. The key and primary element of the ice management plan is the detection and subsequent mapping of ice and iceberg locations, since this provides a fundamental basis for all subsequent ice management decision making such as towing and suspension of operations. Comprehensive explanations of the ice management process and technologies that can be used to facilitate an ice management plan were detailed by Randell et al. (2009). Satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is naturally applicable to map and monitor icebergs and sea ice due to its ability to provide images day or night, through cloud or fog, and various wind conditions. Satellite SAR mapping of ice has been available since the 1970s, although routine SAR monitoring of ice was only made possible in the 1990s with the launch of the European satellite ERS-1 in 1992. This satellite also heralded in an era of large scale data archiving of radar data. In addition to data available through various national ice centres, there is now available an archive of almost 20 years of raw satellite radar data that can be used to create highly detailed historical maps of ice and icebergs to aid in the design process. Many existing and almost all of the new SAR satellites are ‘operational’ in that they provide their data in a near-real-time (NRT) mode, with imagery available via the internet within hours of acquisition. The latest generation of SARs that will be launched within the next few years are specifying imagery delivery times of less than one hour; an investment in a ground station facility can allow data provision in minutes of acquisition. With these capabilities, SAR can be used effectively by the industry to aid in Arctic resource development. The increasing prevalence of SAR, along with lower data costs and more flexible data policies will lead to increased use by the industry into the future.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,400

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,185
Écart entre enseignants0,173 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle