Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Selecting an appropriate method for disposal of hydrocarbon contaminated drilling waste involves a number of fundamental issues; regulatory compliance, environmental risk and liability, cost effectiveness, environmental impact, and timeliness of disposal. The objective of this presentation is to review the field and lab data associated with the compost bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated drilling wastes. Based on the technical data compiled since 1996, compost treatment of hydrocarbon contaminated wastes effectively addresses the disposal issues outlined above. The results of our studies indicate that composting is not only an effective method of hydrocarbon contaminated waste treatment, but the resulting media is a nutrient rich, organic value added product, useful in reclamation of the well site or associated activity areas. Newpark's compost media has been exposed to a multitude of leachability, toxicity, and physical characterization studies; and is found to meet with compost maturity criteria as set our by the CCME, BNQ, and AAFC! Newpark has developed the program to a cost effective, environmentally sound treatment technology which we provide to our clients on over 300 projects throughout western Canada; as well as at our bioremediation facilities in Nova Scotia and Wyoming. Application of this method of bioremediation is not only effective for the treatment of drilling wastes but is also effective for the remediation of other types of hydrocarbon contaminated media. (e.g. Soil contamination from oil spills). Introduction The year 2001 drilling season will generate in excess of 500,000 cubic metres of oily drilling waste in Western Canada alone. The petroleum hydrocarbon contamination issue is further illustrated by several hundred thousand tonnes of contaminated soils seen annually throughout our region. Management options for these contaminated materials include the following:Landfill DisposalLandfarming / landtreatment systemsEncapsulation / stabilizationThermal Destruction or recyclingWashing and recovery systems Landfill disposal is, by far, the most common disposal option for these wastes in Alberta. Many operators choose to manage these wastes on their own property, thereby maintaining liability control 'on-site and infield'. Outside of Alberta there are increased restrictions on burial of such materials, and treatment is required to address future liability issues. Soil conservation, waste recovery, recycling, conversion, and resource management concepts have been a major driving force for effective bioremediation techniques. Typically, a bioremediation treatment system will falter in it's ability to meet financial goals or closure requirements. In addition, many bioremedial methods perform poorly in our generally difficult Canadian climate. In the past land treatments were the mainstay of Newpark's 'in-field' bioremediation systems throughout Western Canada. Land treatments had demonstrated successful treatment of oily drilling wastes and had provided operators with 'cradle to grave' management. However, due to our climate and land restrictions, it was clear that land treatments were not the best answer and were becoming less attractive to our clients. Operators were looking for solutions to the restrictions imposed by land treatment systems; timely management, large land disturbances, aggravation of native soils, and potential reclamation difficulties. Newpark Environmental Services has been actively involved with the development of innovative, yet practical, bioremediation programs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».