Pontus de Tyard: errances et enracinement. Actes du Colloque international de Bissy-sur-Fley (23–25 septembre 2005) <i>Pontus de Tyard: errances et enracinement. Actes du Colloque international de Bissy-sur-Fley (23–25 septembre 2005)</i> . Edited by F <scp>rançois</scp> R <scp>ouget</scp> . (Colloques, congrès et conférences sur la Renaissance européenne, 60). Paris: Honoré Champion, 2008. 320 pp., ill. Hb €59.00.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For all his activity as a Pléiade poet, long-lived writer on an astonishing variety of humanist subjects, adviser to Henri III, member of the Académie du Palais, and embattled bishop during the Wars of Religion, Pontus de Tyard and his work have remained, as Jean-Claude Carron underlines, mostly invisible both to the general public and to French seiziémistes (p. 132). Foreign scholars (Frances Yates, Silvio F. Baridon, John C. Lapp, Kathleen M. Hall) began to study him in the 1940s and 1950s, and this tradition continued with theses in Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, and the USA. It is, however, chiefly owing to the efforts of the Canadian scholar Eva Kushner, and secondarily to those of Sylviane Bokdam (Paris XII), that Tyard has come to occupy a recognized place on the sixteenth-century map. His complete works have started to appear, and conferences devoted exclusively to him were held in 1998 and 2005. The present publication, the proceedings of the 2005 conference (at Tyard's own château) celebrating the fourth centenary of his death, contains twenty papers of unequal length plus an ‘Avant-propos’ and an introduction. Except for the old-fashioned reliance on footnote references, the volume is in a very readable format and mostly exempt from error (however, for ‘Bissy’ read ‘Bragny’ (p. 14), for ‘Bongoutx’ read ‘Jongoux’ (pp. 41, 43), and for ‘Jacques de Vintimille’ read ‘Francesco da Milano’ (p. 136)). The theme of ‘errances et enracinement’ is meant to emphasize both Tyard's literal attachment to Burgundy and his ‘wanderings’ in Paris; and his figurative, spiritual roots in Ficinian Christianity and the intellectual curiosity that took him in many other directions. The quality of the papers is almost uniformly high and most will interest and inform even those readers with a good knowledge of Tyard's œuvre. Some adduce extratextual evidence to situate him at home and, so to speak, abroad; others submit his best-known works to very learned intertextual analysis; still others (Marie-Madeleine Fragonard, Jean Céard) lucidly explore his less familiar, relatively inaccessible late books, providing extensive quotations from these texts so that the argument need not be taken on faith alone. For the non-specialist, the essays devoted to Tyard's poetry (particularly Heidi Marek, François Rigolot, S. Bokdam, and Philip Ford) certainly deepen and illuminate our understanding of Renaissance lyricism in general; while Ilana Zinguer on translation and Sophie Kessler-Mesguich on Tyard's Hebrew and Aramaic dictionaries and grammars broaden our perspective by reminding us that French Renaissance thinkers did not limit themselves to an occidental, Greco-Christian world view. Jean Vignes, relying on documents rather than suppositions, investigates Tyard's contribution to the late century debates over music and measured verse and clarifies at last his role in the academies of Charles IX/Baïf and Henri III. Finally, Carron's excellent synthèse, which ought to have been better placed, demonstrates that the ‘déconcertante complexité’ of Tyard's writings arises from his deep-seated Christianity. His religiosity both informed his errances into rationalism and deformed the results of his research, thereby diminishing his originality and, concomitantly, reducing his interest and importance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,228 | 0,074 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».