P1-S6.09 An audit of management of prenatal syphilis serology in the STI Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Outbreaks of syphilis have been occurring across Canada since 2001, with the province of Alberta having the 2nd highest incidence in 2007. As a result, there has been a national increase in the number of reported congenital cases. Current Canadian guidelines recommend performing syphilis serology at the 1st prenatal visit with rescreening at 28–32 weeks gestation, and at delivery in high-risk women. In our center, any positive syphilis serology is referred to the Calgary STI Clinic for staging and treatment recommendations. This is an internal audit of positive prenatal syphilis serologies from 2009 to 2010. Methods Charts from pregnant women with a positive prenatal syphilis serology, defined as a positive or indeterminate syphilis EIA, from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Syphilis staging was performed by the Medical Director according to national criteria. Results 48 charts were reviewed: 9 were staged as biological false positives, 22 were previously adequately treated women with low or negative RPR titres not suggestive of reinfection, 13 were late latent (LL) treated with 7.2 μ of benzathine penicillin (PCN), and 4 were early latent (EL) treated with 2.4 μ of benzathine PCN. The mean number of days it took from receipt of a positive serology to contacting the patient were 9.8, 10.2, 2.3, and 1.8, respectively. The mean time to 1st dose of PCN was 8.8 for EL and 17.8 for LL (see Abstract P1-S6.09 table 1). There was 1 case of congenital syphilis in an infant whose mother presented in labour with no prenatal care-her RPR was 1:256. 1 woman with an RPR titre of 1:128 was treated with benzathine PCN 1 week before her estimated date of delivery. She went into preterm labour the afternoon post-injection; it is unclear whether or not the injection induced preterm labour. Her twins were treated with iv PCN with no adverse outcomes. Abstract P1-S6.09 Table 1 Syphilis Stage= (N)/48 Range (days) from Start of Investigation to First Contact Mean Number of Days to First Contact Mean Number of Days to 1 st Dose Biological False Positives=9 1–29 9.8 N/A Previously Treated=22 1–31 10.2 N/A Early Latent=4 0–4 1.8 8.8 Late Latent=13 0–7 2.3 17.8 (5.2 if outliers removed)* *3 patients were difficult to contact or noncompliant, taking 44, 54, and 68 days. Conclusions Routine prenatal syphilis screening has identified 14/48 women who required PCN treatment, all of whom received PCN prior to delivery with only 1 woman experiencing a possible adverse event. The only congenital case occurred in a mother with no prenatal care, suggesting a need for a strategy to identify marginalised women with syphilis early in pregnancy. Although the average time to contact these patients was short, the time to administration of 1st dose of PCN was longer, reflecting the need to educate women about the importance of prompt and complete therapy in preventing congenital syphilis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».