MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2033479563 · doi:10.1353/nin.2013.0044

Youth Baseball and Colonial Identity in Taiwan, 1920–1968

2013· article· en· W2033479563 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesWaseda University
Mots-clésVictoryLeagueColonialismChinaNationalismNational identityPolitical scienceBasketballMedia studiesHistoryGender studiesAdvertisingEconomic historySociologyLawPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Youth Baseball and Colonial Identity in Taiwan, 1920–1968 John Harney (bio) In 1968, the Hongye team walked off the baseball diamond as victors and national heroes. Their victory came at the expense of a Japanese team widely reported in the Taiwanese press as champions of the world. The athletes were children, middle-school-aged boys, representing a school in the rural southeast of the island. Their opponents hailed from the same region of Japan, Wakayama, that had produced the Little League World Series champions of the year before. The Taizhong Gold Dragons entered the Little League World Series the following year as Taiwan’s first representatives at the competition. They won the championship. As if from nowhere, youth baseball was a major event in Taiwanese public life.1 Despite the continuing popularity of baseball in Taiwan—including a domestic professional league, participation in the Olympic games, and high-profile players arriving in the US major leagues—the Hongye team remains the most well-known sports team in Taiwanese history and one of the most fascinating sports teams to study for academics drawn to modern sport in East Asia. The team’s signature victory was more than an opportunity for Cold War propaganda grasped by the Republic of China (ROC) government: it signaled a transition in the role of baseball in Taiwanese popular culture from that of a remaining vestige of Japanese colonial influence to a representation of Chinese nationalism. It is interesting that this transition did not occur earlier, with Taiwan’s return to the auspices of the ROC in 1945 following Japan’s defeat in World War II. Academics frequently discuss sport in terms of its value in promoting political ideologies from the top down in colonial and postcolonial societies. Taiwan is no exception.2 Other approaches make the convincing argument that popular sport offered local communities an avenue of resistance within the dominant current of the colonizing nation’s cultural assault.3 This understanding of sport in colonial and postcolonial contexts can also be limiting. Indeed, Taiwanese youth baseball offers us an alternative model: that [End Page 20] of a sporting community directly representing the colonial culture of Japanese seeking to live as members of the extended imperial Japanese cultural demesne. This cultural enclave must be understood separately from binary interpretations of ideological indoctrination and subtle resistance. Popular sport, baseball in this case, gives us insight into the relationship between the core and periphery of the colonial world and the detritus that remains following their severance.4 A Brief History of Taiwan as Colony and Refuge Japan successfully colonized Taiwan in 1895 following a comprehensive victory in the Sino-Japanese War of that year. Taiwanese colonial life settled into a relatively comfortable pattern of compromise between a landed Japanese elite group and ethnic Chinese locals after an initial period of bloody conflict, though aboriginal communities on the island continued to offer significant violent resistance.5 The colonial Japanese settled mostly around the newly formed colonial government in the northern city of Taipei. Further south, ethnic Chinese communities predominated alongside vestiges of the pacified aboriginal society. Taiwan was not bereft of opposition to colonial rule, but relations between the Japanese colonial government and local Taiwanese remained remarkably conciliatory in comparison with Japanese experience in Korea following the colonization of that country in 1910. Improvements in the local infrastructure and limited political concessions contributed to a relatively placid political environment in colonial Taiwan.6 Japanese approaches to integrating the local Taiwanese population into a wider imperial Japanese identity oscillated between assimilation and coexistence. This latter policy prevailed during the early decades of colonization, but Tokyo’s growing interest in assimilating the local population accelerated from the 1920s onwards. Still, though the Japanese language was fervently promoted, Chinese became a proscribed tongue only in the 1930s with the increasing militarization of government and society back in Japan. Taiwanese baseball ironically declined during the final years of colonial rule as the Japanese sought to use the fields otherwise reserved for their favorite sport for military exercises. Otherwise, the sport prospered, a sign of Japanese success in dominating the character of colonial Taiwanese culture. Taiwan returned to Chinese control in 1945 following...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,658
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,942

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0590,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,213
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle