MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2033480401 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8411.2008.00222_16.x

<i>The Political Economy of the SARS Epidemic: the impact on human resources in East Asia</i> ‐ by Grace O.M. Lee and Malcolm Warner

2008· article· en· W2033480401 sur OpenAlex
Marika Vicziany

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsian-Pacific Economic Literature · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChinaContext (archaeology)PoliticsDevelopment economicsHistoryPandemicPolitical scienceEconomic historyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseLawMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Economics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Political Economy of the SARS Epidemic: the impact on human resources in East Asia Lee, Grace O.M. and Warner, Malcolm Routledge , Abingdon , 2008 Pp. xxii +168 . ISBN 978 0 415 39498 7 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) remains one of the most important new diseases to emerge in recent human history, despite its low levels of recorded infectivity and mortality. As a coronavirus, a distant cousin of the common cold, SARS has no obvious cause or cure, nor is there any medical intervention that can help to mitigate the disease once it establishes itself in the host. The spread of the virus has been wonderfully documented in this lucid and balanced study, which acknowledges the lack of data about the virus which affected the first human being on 16 November 2002 in Guangdong province, southern China. Lee and Warner have divided their multi-disciplinary study into three parts. The first places the SARS contagion into a historical context, underscoring the fact that SARS has not been a big killer compared to World War Two, the Black Death, or the Spanish Flu (Figure 2.3 sets out these parameters with great clarity), without minimising the importance of surveillance and containment. The second part is a detailed analysis of the epidemic in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore, while the third looks at the ‘lessons to be learnt’ from SARS. These latter two sections of the monograph lead the reader to conclude that, without the strict measures introduced as a result of international cooperation between many national governments and the World Health Organisation (WHO), SARS might have been catastrophic at a global level. By implication, if SARS or some other unknown and virulent agent were to appear, the risks of international contagion remain extreme. The key lessons to emerge from this study are: first, the necessity of national governments remaining transparent in acknowledging and monitoring disease outbreaks; and second, the need to share that information at a global level so that rapid and appropriate international responses are feasible. The containment of infected and suspected cases at the national level must be matched with the imposition of international quarantine. Above all, SARS, or any other epidemic, must avoid becoming an instrument of political ambition. The politicisation of SARS is documented in Part Two, a case study of the People's Republic of China. From mid-February to mid-March 2003, the Chinese government continued to deny that ‘atypical pneumonia’ (the name for this strange disease before it was labelled as SARS) had constituted a problem. Denial coincided with the WHO declaration that the disease had surfaced in Canada and Europe. The eventual willingness of the PRC in April 2003 to acknowledge that they had mishandled the health crisis constituted not only an important breakthrough in the containment of the epidemic, but also provided a critical lesson for the future—if the powerful Chinese government could not stop local whistleblowers, then no government in the world could. The country-case studies in Part Two provide a detailed analysis of the economic impact of SARS on East Asia. Drawing together a diverse range of information, they argue that as the region's prosperity increased, the services sector grew—especially tourism, hotels, and international and domestic travel businesses. The services sector typically requires greater domestic and international labour mobility, and it is this mobility that helped to disseminate SARS. Moreover, Lee and Warner show that the greater a country's dependency on services the greater the negative economic fallout from SARS. We can surmise that the East Asian growth trajectory will continue to depend on the expansion of the services sector, thereby exposing national economies to the economic and other vulnerabilities revealed by SARS. This is why the work of Lee and Warner is as relevant to security specialists as it is to scholars, scientists and business people. If we are to confront a similar, future contagion in a manner that is speedy, saves lives, contains domestic panic, and prevents the international economy from being destabilised, we can benefit by studying the SARS epidemic of 2002–04 and preparing appropriate responses now. One question remains: how many governments today have strategies in place to contain SARS-like infections?

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,955
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle