MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2035313795 · doi:10.2514/1.46441

Geometric Approach to Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Magnetic and Mechanical Actuation

2010· article· en· W2035313795 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueInertial Sensor and Navigation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpacecraftReaction wheelAttitude controlControl theory (sociology)Control moment gyroscopeTorqueActuatorMagnetic fieldPhysicsInertial frame of referenceQuaternionAerospace engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Classical mechanicsMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I T IS well known that spacecraft in low Earth orbit can generate control torques via the interaction of theEarth’s geomagneticfield and onboard magnetic dipole moments (created via current-carrying coils) [1,2]. As mentioned in [3], the major shortcoming of magnetic actuation (as the only onboard actuator) is that control torques can only be applied to the spacecraft in a plane orthogonal to the instantaneous direction of the Earth’s magnetic field, which in turn means that the spacecraft is instantaneously underactuated. Recently, in [4,5], inertial pointing of a spacecraft using solely magnetic actuation was considered. It was shown that stabilization can be obtained while employing a quaternion and angular velocity proportional derivative (PD) type of control law. Owing to the timevarying nature of the system, the control gains are shown to be limited, which in turn leads to closed-loop performance limitations. Stability (and proof thereof) relies on averaging theory [6], which physically translates to the system possessing certain dynamic properties on average. In particular, it is assumed that on average control torques can be applied to the spacecraft in any direction owing to the fact the magnetic field is changing direction as the spacecraft orbits the Earth. Modern spacecraft are usually endowed with magnetic torquers and some type of mechanical actuator, such as reaction wheels. The magnetic torquers are usually used for detumbling of the spacecraft upon egress from the launch vehicle, as well as momentum dumping of reaction wheels. Reactionwheels are used for fine attitude control. Seldom are both magnetic torquers and reaction wheels intended to work together harmoniously in concert. Having both actuation systems work simultaneously can lead to power savings (depending on, among other things, orbit inclination, control scheme and gains, etc. [7]), as well as reduce reaction wheel torque requirements. Additionally, although most spacecraft are equipped with redundant reaction ormomentumwheels, failure of both primary and secondary wheels in one axis is possible, as discussed in [8]. Upon the failure of primary and redundant pitch axis wheels, the attitude control system of RADARSAT-1was redesigned (and subsequently uploaded while on orbit) to use the remaining wheels and magnetic actuation together, thus saving themission.Attitude control of spacecraft using two actuation systems was also considered in [9,10]. Motivated by [4,5], in [9] the same magnetic control law was augmented with reaction wheels; sufficient conditions were given such that the gain limited nature of the magnetic control law was relaxed, leading to better closed-loop system performance. In [10] the attitude control of a spacecraft using both magnetic torquers and thrusters based on a linear time-periodic model was considered, leading to linear timeinvariant and linear time-periodic control designs. Actuator saturation was also considered. In this paper we consider the control of a spacecraft using both magnetic and mechanical actuation in tandem. We present a geometric scheme whereby the control vector is decomposed into orthogonal and parallel components with respect to the orientation of the instantaneous magnetic field vector. The spacecraft magnetic torquers apply the orthogonal control component, while the remaining parallel component is applied by mechanical actuators, specifically, reaction wheels. We show that our control decomposition is not limited to spacecraft equipped with three wheels, but those equipped with one, two, or three wheels. Additionally, saturation of the torque rods is considered. The effectiveness of our method is shown to work well in simulation while employing an adaptive tracking controller.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,846
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,398

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle