MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2035313795 · doi:10.2514/1.46441

Geometric Approach to Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Magnetic and Mechanical Actuation

2010· article· en· W2035313795 sur OpenAlexaff
James Richard Forbes, Christopher J. Damaren

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueInertial Sensor and Navigation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpacecraftReaction wheelAttitude controlControl theory (sociology)Control moment gyroscopeTorqueActuatorMagnetic fieldPhysicsInertial frame of referenceQuaternionAerospace engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Classical mechanicsMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I T IS well known that spacecraft in low Earth orbit can generate control torques via the interaction of theEarth’s geomagneticfield and onboard magnetic dipole moments (created via current-carrying coils) [1,2]. As mentioned in [3], the major shortcoming of magnetic actuation (as the only onboard actuator) is that control torques can only be applied to the spacecraft in a plane orthogonal to the instantaneous direction of the Earth’s magnetic field, which in turn means that the spacecraft is instantaneously underactuated. Recently, in [4,5], inertial pointing of a spacecraft using solely magnetic actuation was considered. It was shown that stabilization can be obtained while employing a quaternion and angular velocity proportional derivative (PD) type of control law. Owing to the timevarying nature of the system, the control gains are shown to be limited, which in turn leads to closed-loop performance limitations. Stability (and proof thereof) relies on averaging theory [6], which physically translates to the system possessing certain dynamic properties on average. In particular, it is assumed that on average control torques can be applied to the spacecraft in any direction owing to the fact the magnetic field is changing direction as the spacecraft orbits the Earth. Modern spacecraft are usually endowed with magnetic torquers and some type of mechanical actuator, such as reaction wheels. The magnetic torquers are usually used for detumbling of the spacecraft upon egress from the launch vehicle, as well as momentum dumping of reaction wheels. Reactionwheels are used for fine attitude control. Seldom are both magnetic torquers and reaction wheels intended to work together harmoniously in concert. Having both actuation systems work simultaneously can lead to power savings (depending on, among other things, orbit inclination, control scheme and gains, etc. [7]), as well as reduce reaction wheel torque requirements. Additionally, although most spacecraft are equipped with redundant reaction ormomentumwheels, failure of both primary and secondary wheels in one axis is possible, as discussed in [8]. Upon the failure of primary and redundant pitch axis wheels, the attitude control system of RADARSAT-1was redesigned (and subsequently uploaded while on orbit) to use the remaining wheels and magnetic actuation together, thus saving themission.Attitude control of spacecraft using two actuation systems was also considered in [9,10]. Motivated by [4,5], in [9] the same magnetic control law was augmented with reaction wheels; sufficient conditions were given such that the gain limited nature of the magnetic control law was relaxed, leading to better closed-loop system performance. In [10] the attitude control of a spacecraft using both magnetic torquers and thrusters based on a linear time-periodic model was considered, leading to linear timeinvariant and linear time-periodic control designs. Actuator saturation was also considered. In this paper we consider the control of a spacecraft using both magnetic and mechanical actuation in tandem. We present a geometric scheme whereby the control vector is decomposed into orthogonal and parallel components with respect to the orientation of the instantaneous magnetic field vector. The spacecraft magnetic torquers apply the orthogonal control component, while the remaining parallel component is applied by mechanical actuators, specifically, reaction wheels. We show that our control decomposition is not limited to spacecraft equipped with three wheels, but those equipped with one, two, or three wheels. Additionally, saturation of the torque rods is considered. The effectiveness of our method is shown to work well in simulation while employing an adaptive tracking controller.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations46
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Guidance Control and DynamicsMême sujetInertial Sensor and NavigationTravaux en français237 207