Compaction-corrected paleomagnetic paleolatitudes for Late Cretaceous rudists along the Cretaceous California margin: Evidence for less than 1500 km of post–Late Cretaceous offset for Baja British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research Article| September 01, 2001 Compaction-corrected paleomagnetic paleolatitudes for Late Cretaceous rudists along the Cretaceous California margin: Evidence for less than 1500 km of post–Late Cretaceous offset for Baja British Columbia K.P. Kodama; K.P. Kodama 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, 31 Williams Drive, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-3188, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Peter D. Ward Peter D. Ward 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, 31 Williams Drive, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-3188, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information K.P. Kodama 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, 31 Williams Drive, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-3188, USA Peter D. Ward 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, 31 Williams Drive, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-3188, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 14 Apr 2000 Revision Received: 13 Dec 2000 Accepted: 06 Mar 2001 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2001) 113 (9): 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<1171:CCPPFL>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 14 Apr 2000 Revision Received: 13 Dec 2000 Accepted: 06 Mar 2001 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation K.P. Kodama, Peter D. Ward; Compaction-corrected paleomagnetic paleolatitudes for Late Cretaceous rudists along the Cretaceous California margin: Evidence for less than 1500 km of post–Late Cretaceous offset for Baja British Columbia. GSA Bulletin 2001;; 113 (9): 1171–1178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<1171:CCPPFL>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract The paleolatitudinal distribution of bivalve rudists has important significance for the Baja British Columbia (Baja BC) hypothesis that western Canadian superterranes from British Columbia have been displaced 3000 km since Cretaceous time. Rudists are not observed in Baja BC sedimentary rocks, yet they are common in Late Cretaceous strata in California and Baja California, which have the same paleomagnetically determined paleolatitudes (approximately 25°N) as Baja BC rocks of Late Cretaceous age. In order to resolve this contradiction and to delimit more exactly the southern paleolatitudes of Baja BC, paleomagnetic inclinations corrected for the effects of burial compaction were used to determine the paleolatitudinal distribution of rudists along the California margin. Compaction-corrected paleomagnetic data from the Peninsular Ranges and Salinia terranes indicate that rudists were restricted to paleolatitudes between 34° and 40°N. Evidence of coastal upwelling in the latest Cretaceous Marca Shale may explain the northern limit of the rudist distribution. These data suggest that Baja BC was no farther south than 40°N in the Late Cretaceous, thus limiting its post-Cretaceous displacement to less than 1500 km, and that burial compaction has also affected the paleomagnetism of Nanaimo Group sedimentary rocks from Vancouver Island. This result also helps resolve the conflict between paleomagnetic results, which show 1500 km of post–Late Cretaceous offset between the Insular–Coast Plutonic Complex superterrane and the Intermontane superterrane and geologic observations, which can allow only tens of kilometers of offset between these terranes in the Methow- Tyaughton basin. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».