Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Cambridge Companion to the Irish Novel Jonathan Boulter (bio) John Wilson Foster, editor. The Cambridge Companion to the Irish Novel. Cambridge University Press. 2006. xx, 286. US $30.95 The Cambridge Companion to the Irish Novel is essentially, and perhaps unavoidably, an elaborated summary of important Irish novels, more an extended annotated bibliography than a series of exegetical essays. Moving from Castle Rackrent (1800) to the present day (John Banville’s work is given the final, brief mention), the volume is divided predictably, one might say conservatively, into twelve sections: the novel before 1800; the novel and the national tale; the novel of the big house; the Gothic novel; the Catholic novel; the modern novel; the regional novel; the novel written in Irish; the female novelist; the novel and life [End Page 270] writing; the novel of the Troubles; and the contemporary Irish novel. Two chapters are given over to considerations of individual writers: there is a chapter on Joyce and another discussing Beckett and O’Brien as exemplars of the postmodern. I applaud the volume’s attempted synopticism, but, as is often true in such multi-authored texts, The Cambridge Companion to the Irish Novel is severely unbalanced in terms of critical quality. A great deal of space in some of the weaker essays – weak in the sense that no real argument or thesis is expounded or explored – is given over to simple lists of various works followed by a brief plot summary. Aileen Douglas’s ‘The Novel before 1800,’ for instance, is really a compendium of titles of work predating Castle Rackrent; Vera Kreilkamp’s ‘The Novel of the Big House’ similarly functions as another list, this time organized around authors (from Maria Edgeworth to John Banville): despite her subject matter, she offers no sustained analysis of the psycho-geography or ideological textuality of space as such; James H. Murphy’s ‘Catholics and Fiction during the Union’ is dryly informational, offering (yet) another list of authors who wrote between 1801 and 1922. Bruce Stewart and Terence Brown both have offered overviews of the works of Joyce, Samuel Beckett, and Flann O’Brien. Stewart’s ‘James Joyce’ neatly summarizes Joyce’s career and major works and would stand as an effective undergraduate introductory lecture on Joyce’s career, but one should not expect any sustained readings of the novels. Brown’s essay on Beckett and O’Brien attempts to locate a postmodernism in these two writers; a major fault here, however, is that Brown begs the question of the term ‘postmodern’ and thus never engages with the vexed question of how the work of a writer as singular as Beckett would resist such an easy – and lazy – characterization. Readers may also be puzzled by Brown’s decision not to mention Beckett’s later trilogy (Company, Worstward Ho, Ill Seen Ill Said), given that it is here that Beckett made his Irishness a major theme. I am certain that the mandate of the Companion series favours information over exegesis: my criticisms are thus perhaps slightly off the mark. But after reading the tremendously successful essays – essays that manage to be informational and to offer complex and theoretical readings – I wonder if some editorial missteps have occurred here. Miranda Burgess’s ‘The National Tale and Allied Genres, 1770s–1840s’ begins usefully with a section entitled ‘Theories of the National Tale’; here she suggests – very successfully – that the national tale is ‘concerned less with the achievement of a general kind of sociopolitical stability than it is with social and political dialogue and critical assessment’; this observation about the centrality of dialogue and exchange – of negotiated realities – serves her well in her readings of Castle Rackrent, Florence Macarthy (1818), and The Wild Irish Boy (1808). Siobhan Kilfeather’s ‘The Gothic [End Page 271] Novel’ is another excellent essay; she offers a splendid reading of the Gothic, using Burke’s notion of the sublime as a guide; through readings of novels as various as Melmoth the Wanderer (1820), The Wild Irish Girl (1806), and Le Fanu’s The House in the Churchyard (1861–63), Kilfeather manages to offer a way of thinking about how the particular Irishness of the Gothic (its...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».