MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2035983547 · doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.129304

John B. Grant International Statesman of Public Health

2008· article· en· W2035983547 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liping Bu, Elizabeth Fee

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Journal of Public Health · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublic healthInternational healthBeijingHealth careChinaSanitationHealth policyMedicinePolitical scienceLibrary scienceNursingLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

JOHN B. GRANT WAS BORN to Canadian medical missionaries in Ningbo, China, in 1890. He graduated from Acadia College in Nova Scotia in 1912 and received his medical education at University of Michigan and his public health degree from the Johns Hopkins University. He would later often refer to Arthur Newsholme and Victor C. Vaughan (his professors in public health), together with George Newman, as the men who had most influenced his thinking about public health.1 Grant joined the International Health Board of the Rockefeller Foundation in 1918 and gained practical experience in a county health program in North Carolina. He went to China to conduct a hookworm survey in 1919. In 1921, Grant was appointed International Health Division representative in China and associate professor of public health of the Peking Union Medical College. Grant believed that public health was an integral part of socioeconomic progress and that health care could be best achieved by combining preventive and curative medicine through a community “health station.” In 1925, he created a health demonstration station, Beijing First Health Demonstration Station, as a “social laboratory” for training public health professionals and medical students of Peking Union Medical College. The station, a project of collaboration with Beijing Municipal Police in a ward of 95 956 people half a mile from Peking Union Medical College, had three divisions of activities: general sanitation, vital statistics and communicable diseases, and medical services. Besides regular teaching and investigative research, the station maintained a school health service for 1800 students and an industrial medical service for 1200 workers. It also served as a health center for a population of 45 000. The health station offered short training courses for traditional midwives and municipal sanitary police.2 The courses for the midwives developed into the First National Midwifery School in 1928, which represented a significant advance toward modern maternity and child health work in China. The health station experiment was extended into rural China in 1929 when Grant and his colleagues established a health station in Ding Xian, a county of 400 000 people west of Beijing. The Ding Xian experiment integrated health work into a comprehensive rural education and reform movement. It provided affordable health care to the peasants and short training courses for village health workers. These efforts provided the models for the training of barefoot doctors and rural health reforms in the 1950s to 1970s.3 Grant’s ideas of health work on a community basis constituted an innovative experiment in the 1920s, but they matured in the following decades as Grant applied the lessons learned in China to many other countries. In 1939, after 18 years of health work in China, Grant was appointed director of the All-India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health in Calcutta and served in this position until 1945. He was instrumental in shaping the recommendations of the Bhore Committee in 1944, which provided a blueprint for the organization of medical education and health care in India. After World War II, Grant worked with international and US governmental organizations including the Economic Cooperation Administration, President Truman’s Commission on the Health Needs of the Nation, and the World Health Organization. He conducted surveys of medical care plans in the United States, Canada, Asia, and Europe. From 1954 until his death in October 1962, Grant advised the Puerto Rican government on a plan for regionalization of their health services, showing how the hospitals and medical services belonging to different agencies could be coordinated into a smoothly working system to provide even the most isolated villages with access to excellent medical care. Grant also taught as professor of public health at the University of Puerto Rico.4 Many countries awarded Grant with high honors for his contributions to public health. China presented him with the Jade Order in 1940; Britain honored him with Commander of the Most Excellent Order in 1945, France with Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur in 1952, and Denmark with Commander of the Order of the Elephant in 1952. The United States awarded him the Lasker Award in 1960 “in recognition of more than forty years of inspired leadership in promoting the health and well-being of mankind throughout the world.”5

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,858
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,108
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,183 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican Journal of Public HealthMême sujetHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisTravaux en français237 207