MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2036411161 · doi:10.1353/cpp.2012.0027

Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada (review)

2012· article· en· W2036411161 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Joseph Mensah

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Public Policy · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmigrationInclusion (mineral)Settlement (finance)Government (linguistics)DominionPolitical scienceEconomic historySociologyHistoryLawGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada Joseph Mensah Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada edited by John Biles, Meyer Burstein, James Frideres, Erin Tolley, and Robert Vineberg. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011. 419 pp. Paper $39.95. Following the creation of the Metropolis project and its network of research centres in the mid-1990s, there has been a flood of publications on immigration and settlement issues in Canada, and Integration and Inclusion of Newcomers and Minorities across Canada is a welcome addition to this burgeoning literature. Edited by John Biles, Meyer Burstein, James Frideres, Erin Tolley, and Robert Vineberg, this volume examines the settlement and integration programs across Canada in an integrated fashion. The volume consists of a general introduction, 13 substantive chapters, and a conclusion. Expectedly, the introduction charts the course of the book, detailing its objectives and the themes of the subsequent chapters. Besides the first two chapters that chronicle the history of federal and provincial/territorial relations in immigration, the volume moves from the west coast, with British Columbia as Chapter 3, through the Prairies and Central Canada to Atlantic Canada, before dealing with the northern territories in the last substantive chapter. In Chapter 1, we learn from Robert Vineberg that while many see the provincial interest in immigration as a recent phenomenon, it actually goes back to the nineteenth century, with the first federal-provincial conference on immigration taking place in 1868. However, as the Dominion government gained more experience in immigration, with the peopling of the federal territories of the West, the interest of the provinces waned, until the post-war era when normal immigration resumed and the flow of refugees increased. As Vineberg points out, at present all the provinces are involved in immigration. In Chapter 2, Joseph Garcea and Neil Hibbert deal with the history of federal-provincial involvement in immigration, using the policy frameworks of multiculturalism, human rights, anti-racism, and employment and pay equity as their point of departure. While the chapter describes these frameworks lucidly, it lacks a critical insight into their efficacy. In Chapter 3, Dan Hiebert and Kathy Sherrell examine the various immigrant integration initiatives in British Columbia, showing how neoliberalism has influenced the government’s involvement in this area since 2001. In their estimation, the level of coordination between the various ministries concerned with immigration and social policies leaves much to be desired. The next three chapters deal with the Prairie provinces. James Frideres writes splendidly about the “four strong winds” blowing in Alberta’s immigration “without direction.” He notes that in the absence of a clear immigration strategy, immigrant organizations have difficulty procuring funds from the provincial government. Joseph Garcea examines the situation in Saskatchewan in Chapter 5, detailing the persistent challenges in aligning the operations of the government with those of NGOs in the provision of immigrant services. In Chapter 6, Tom Carter and Ben Amoyaw discuss Manitoba’s struggles in attracting immigrants, shedding light on the existing immigrant services in the province. Manitoba seems to lack adequate coordination between its ministries when it comes to the provision of immigrant service. In Chapter 7, John Biles, Erin Tolley, Caroline Andre, Vic Esses, and Meyer Burstein write eloquently about Ontario, highlighting the extensive downloading of services that went on under the Conservative government of the 1990s. As they point out, because Ontario has for decades received the bulk of Canada’s immigrants, it has a long history in dealing with diversity; yet, racism continues to unsettle many of its minorities. In Chapter 8, Annick Germain and Tuyet Trinh show how the tensions between decentralization and recentralization of immigrant services delivery in Quebec have rendered the system unstable. The next four chapters deal with Atlantic Canada, with Chedly Belkhodja and Christophe Traisnel [End Page 438] writing on New Brunswick in Chapter 9; Marguerite Cassin on Nova Scotia in Chapter 10; Reeta Tremblay and Amanda Bittner on Newfoundland and Labrador in Chapter 11; and Godfrey Baldacchino, Paula Brochu, and Craig Mackie writing parts 1, 2, and 3 of Chapter 12 on PEI, respectively. The recurrent theme across these chapters concerns the difficulties in attracting immigrants to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,257
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,516

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0040,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Public PolicyMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207