MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2036647082 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0163

Who's Who in the Age of Alexander the Great (review)

2008· article· en· W2036647082 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sheila L. Ager

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClassical Antiquity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipAudience measurementProsopographyCompendiumEmpireClassicsHistoryLiteratureArt historyArtAncient historyLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Who's Who in the Age of Alexander the Great Sheila Ager Waldemar Heckel . Who's Who in the Age of Alexander the Great. Blackwell. xxii, 390. US $99.95 In Who's Who, Waldemar Heckel has produced a work that is both useful and interesting. Encyclopedic in its format, Heckel's book nevertheless succeeds in being readable. Who's Who is a 'prosopography,' a term familiar to classicists, though not perhaps to a more general readership. It is a study of individuals, an encyclopedic compendium of names, identities, careers, and family connections. As the title of the book [End Page 213] indicates, Heckel's prosopographic study focuses specifically on the several hundred individuals whose lives were intimately entwined with or tangentially affected by the career of Alexander the Great (356–23 BCE). Heckel is very well placed to write such a work: his own scholarship over the last three decades has featured major contributions to the study of Alexander and his times, and has included other prosopographical work such as The Marshals of Alexander's Empire (1992). In the introduction to Who's Who, Heckel states the principles underlying the selection of individuals to be featured in this work. He casts his net widely, preferring on the whole to be inclusive rather than exclusive. The catalogue therefore incorporates individuals who 'made only brief appearances on Alexander's stage' as well as those who were principal players. This is a wise choice, as it enables the reader to glean largely complete information on obscure persons, in addition to basic information and – perhaps more essential – references for further reading on more famous individuals. For instance, the brief entry on one Hellanicus tells us as much as is known of who he was (a Macedonian 'of unknown family background') and what he did (a relatively minor role in a military engagement in 334). This entry is immediately succeeded by that on the much more prominent Hephaestion, who was Alexander's right-hand man. This individual, a man of great importance in Alexander's life, merits a much lengthier discussion, over four pages in length (and over two pages of additional notes). This is still admittedly an encyclopedia entry, not a biography. Yet within these constraints Heckel is able to provide a balanced assessment of Hephaestion, relating the chief stages of his life and career, and analyzing aspects of his character and its impact on those around him and around Alexander. The picture that emerges is one of a man who, in spite of the devotion he inspired in Alexander, 'had no extraordinary abilities as a general' and whose quarrelsome nature was more than once a cause of grief to his king. Although males naturally dominate a world that was chiefly – if not exclusively – military in its nature, Heckel's work does not ignore the role of individual women. Entries will be found for (among others) Sisygambis, the Persian Queen Mother, who was captured by Alexander and came to respect and revere him; for Rhoxane, Alexander's beautiful Bactrian bride and the mother of his son, the ill-fated Alexander IV; and for Thaïs, the Athenian courtesan who accompanied Alexander's expedition and was allegedly responsible for inciting Alexander to burn down the great palaces at Persepolis. The individual entries are clear and concise, cross-referenced and providing citations of the relevant ancient sources as well as modern works. Indeed, Heckel's considerable command of the varied and often [End Page 214] fragmentary primary sources will be particularly helpful to the student or scholar seeking to employ Who's Who as a jumping-off point for further research. Aside from the catalogue entries of individuals, Who's Who features roughly a hundred pages of additional resources: extensive notes (the use of which enables Heckel to keep the catalogue entries from being overwhelmed by discussion of particularly difficult source problems and controversial interpretations), appendices, a glossary of terms (chiefly Greek), a concordance of names enabling readers to identify variant forms, a bibliography, and stemmata of the principal families. Who will be the audience for this book? Without a doubt, scholars of ancient history will find it a very valuable reference tool...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetClassical Antiquity StudiesTravaux en français237 207